Candy Schwartz

688 citations
64 papers · 394 indexed · h-index 10

Candy Schwartz

52 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Candy Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Library and Information Sciences 53
  • Information Systems 157
  • Communication 34
  • Conservation 14
  • Computer Science Applications 21
Replace James G. Neal with:
James G. Neal United States
Jarmo Saarti Finland
Yaşar Tonta Türkiye
Sudatta Chowdhury United Kingdom
Alexandra Dimitroff United States
Tom Kwanya Kenya
Farzana Shafique Pakistan
Alistair S. Duff United Kingdom
Kathleen Burnett United States
John V. Richardson United States
Candy Schwartz relative to James G. Neal United States James G. Neal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
James G. Neal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Candy Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candy Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candy Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candy Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candy Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candy Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candy Schwartz. The network helps show where Candy Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Candy Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Candy Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Candy Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20170
2 20161
3 20163
4 20153
5 20121
6
20101
7 200920
8 20084
9 200814
10 200718
11 20061
12 20051
13 200462
14 20031
15 19991
16 19982
17 19959
18
The CD-ROM Journal Literature: Where Do You Look?.
19921
19
Library Services and the Online Campus Gateway. Final Report.
19890
20
Teaching database management
19890

About Candy Schwartz

Candy Schwartz is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Conservation, having authored 64 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (9 papers), Library Science and Administration (7 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (2 papers), Social Development and Education Research (2 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (53 citations), Information Systems (157 citations), Communication (34 citations), Conservation (14 citations) and Computer Science Applications (21 citations). Candy Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Hernon, Pamela Klauer Triolo, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Marilyn Domas White, Donald H. Kraft, Melissa Gross, Josiane Mothe, Gary Marchionini, Justin Zobel and Juris Dilevko. Their work appears in journals such as Library & Information Science Research, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Information Processing & Management, Library trends and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026