C. R. Ashmore
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.5%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- L. DoerrHolly RaysonGeoffrey R. TompkinsJoellen BarnettDavid W. RobinsonPhilip SummersP. B. AddisWilliam B. Parker
- Topics
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders (32 papers)Muscle metabolism and nutrition (13 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceJapan
In The Last Decade
C. R. Ashmore
58 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Molecular Biology 962
- Animal Science and Zoology 834
- Cell Biology 469
- Physiology 358
- Biomedical Engineering 282
Countries citing papers authored by C. R. Ashmore
This map shows the geographic impact of C. R. Ashmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. R. Ashmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. R. Ashmore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. R. Ashmore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. R. Ashmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. R. Ashmore. The network helps show where C. R. Ashmore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. R. Ashmore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. R. Ashmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. R. Ashmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. R. Ashmore. C. R. Ashmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | RECOMMENDED PERFORMANCE-RELATED SPECIFICATION FOR HOT-MIX ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION: RESULTS OF THE WESTRACK PROJECT | 51 |
| 3 | WESTRACK: PUTTING ITS TO WORK | 2 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | A histochemical study of development of muscle fiber type and size in normal and "double muscled" cattle. | 55 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About C. R. Ashmore
C. R. Ashmore is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (32 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (13 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (834 citations), Cell Biology (469 citations) and Molecular Biology (962 citations). C. R. Ashmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include L. Doerr, Holly Rayson, Geoffrey R. Tompkins, Joellen Barnett, David W. Robinson, Philip Summers, P. B. Addis, William B. Parker, Tateki Kikuchi and Robert G. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Analytical Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.