C Nepomuceno
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Edwin W. CookEdward TaubJean E. CragoW. C. FlemingThomas A. NovackP D BlantonWm. Drew GouvierJ. Scott Richards
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers)Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers)Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
C Nepomuceno
11 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Rehabilitation 1.0k
- Neurology 728
- Psychiatry and Mental health 546
- Epidemiology 374
- Pharmacology 318
Countries citing papers authored by C Nepomuceno
This map shows the geographic impact of C Nepomuceno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Nepomuceno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Nepomuceno more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C Nepomuceno
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Nepomuceno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Nepomuceno. The network helps show where C Nepomuceno may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C Nepomuceno
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C Nepomuceno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C Nepomuceno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C Nepomuceno. C Nepomuceno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.breakdown → | 1215 |
| 4 | Diagnosis and management of low back pain. | 4 |
| 5 | Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. | 224 |
| 6 | Reliability of physical examination in patients with chronic pain. | 1 |
| 7 | 126 | |
| 8 | Comparison of actual and simulated EMG biofeedback in the treatment of hemiplegic patients. | 15 |
| 9 | Pain in patients with spinal cord injury. | 156 |
| 10 | Differential analyses of EMG findings in motor neuron lesions. | 2 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Shoulder arthrography in hemiplegic patients. | 27 |
About C Nepomuceno
C Nepomuceno is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rehabilitation and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.0k citations), Neurology (728 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (546 citations). C Nepomuceno has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Edwin W. Cook, Edward Taub, Jean E. Crago, W. C. Fleming, Thomas A. Novack, P D Blanton, Wm. Drew Gouvier, J. Scott Richards, Philip R. Fine and Gerald Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Spinal Cord and Southern Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.