R. Meredith

530 total citations
12 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

R. Meredith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Meredith has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in R. Meredith's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (1 paper). R. Meredith is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (1 paper). R. Meredith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. R. Meredith's co-authors include Simon Stephens, Philip R. Fine, J. Scott Richards, Gerald Bennett, C Nepomuceno, Sarah Hogan, Vinaya Manchaiah, D. Stephens, Fei Zhao and Adrian Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, Clinical Rehabilitation and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

R. Meredith

12 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Meredith United Kingdom 10 242 150 108 99 78 12 445
L. Calvo Spain 14 258 1.1× 8 0.1× 22 0.2× 38 0.4× 89 1.1× 23 538
Karla Mônica Ferraz Brazil 10 74 0.3× 13 0.1× 70 0.6× 13 0.1× 43 0.6× 26 364
Murad Al‐Momani Saudi Arabia 12 120 0.5× 52 0.3× 116 1.1× 14 0.1× 25 0.3× 21 305
Renato de Souza Melo Brazil 12 108 0.4× 15 0.1× 117 1.1× 13 0.1× 66 0.8× 37 376
R. Palomo Spain 14 258 1.1× 8 0.1× 22 0.2× 38 0.4× 89 1.1× 16 529
F. Aranciva Spain 14 258 1.1× 8 0.1× 22 0.2× 38 0.4× 89 1.1× 15 528
E Jonsson Sweden 10 140 0.6× 15 0.1× 10 0.1× 67 0.7× 17 0.2× 23 424
F. Tamayo Spain 14 258 1.1× 8 0.1× 22 0.2× 38 0.4× 89 1.1× 20 529
Hideyuki Saito Japan 14 319 1.3× 137 0.9× 343 3.2× 3 0.0× 18 0.2× 26 569
Susan E. Jurish United States 14 117 0.5× 5 0.0× 67 0.6× 25 0.3× 23 0.3× 16 533

Countries citing papers authored by R. Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Meredith. The network helps show where R. Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Meredith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Meredith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Meredith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Meredith. R. Meredith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Manchaiah, Vinaya, D. Stephens, & R. Meredith. (2011). The patient journey of adults with hearing impairment: the patients’ views. Clinical Otolaryngology. 36(3). 227–234. 66 indexed citations
2.
Zhao, Fei, et al.. (1997). The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. Clinical Otolaryngology. 22(3). 254–259. 56 indexed citations
3.
Zhao, Fan, et al.. (1997). Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with contralateral stimulation in King-Kopetzky syndrome. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 36–44. 8 indexed citations
4.
Herbst, Kobus, R. Meredith, & Simon Stephens. (1991). Implications of hearing impairment for elderly people in london and in wales. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(sup476). 209–214. 29 indexed citations
5.
Meredith, R., et al.. (1991). Physical handling of hearing aids by the elderly. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(sup476). 281–285. 17 indexed citations
6.
Stephens, Simon, et al.. (1991). Early intervention and rehabilitation: Factors influencing outcome. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(sup476). 221–225. 24 indexed citations
7.
Stephens, Simon, Sarah Hogan, & R. Meredith. (1991). The Desynchrony between Complaints and Signs of Vestibular Disorders. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(2). 188–192. 20 indexed citations
8.
Meredith, R., et al.. (1991). Qualitative reports of hearing aid benefit. Clinical Rehabilitation. 5(3). 225–229. 24 indexed citations
9.
Stephens, Simon, et al.. (1991). Acceptability of Binaural Hearing Aids: A Cross-Over Study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 84(5). 267–269. 27 indexed citations
10.
Stephens, Simon, et al.. (1990). Hearing disability in people aged 50-65: effectiveness and acceptability of rehabilitative intervention.. BMJ. 300(6723). 508–511. 44 indexed citations
11.
Meredith, R., et al.. (1989). A comparison of three types of earmoulds in elderly users of post-aural hearing aids. British Journal of Audiology. 23(3). 239–244. 4 indexed citations
12.
Richards, J. Scott, R. Meredith, C Nepomuceno, Philip R. Fine, & Gerald Bennett. (1980). Psycho-social aspects of chronic pain in spinal cord injury. Pain. 8(3). 355–366. 126 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026