C. I. Bliss
- Ecology top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ronald Aylmer FisherE. J. WilliamsAndrew OwenF. N. DavidR. M. CormackP. ArmitageL. N. BalaamJohn W. Tukey
- Topics
- Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers)Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers)Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Statistical AssociationTechnometricsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
C. I. Bliss
32 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Ecology 518
- Plant Science 333
- Insect Science 281
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 278
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 259
Countries citing papers authored by C. I. Bliss
This map shows the geographic impact of C. I. Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. I. Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. I. Bliss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. I. Bliss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. I. Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. I. Bliss. The network helps show where C. I. Bliss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. I. Bliss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. I. Bliss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. I. Bliss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. I. Bliss. C. I. Bliss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silvicultural biomass farms, volume V: conversion processes and costs. | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Statistics in biology. Vol. 2. | 22 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | Statistics in biology : statistical methods for research in the natural sciences | 84 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 201 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About C. I. Bliss
C. I. Bliss is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Food Science and Endocrinology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (206 citations), Insect Science (281 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (259 citations). C. I. Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Aylmer Fisher, E. J. Williams, Andrew Owen, F. N. David, R. M. Cormack, P. Armitage, L. N. Balaam, John W. Tukey, W. G. Cochran and Paul Leaverton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Technometrics and American Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.