C. Field

545 citations
6 papers · 162 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Interciencia (1 paper)Functional Ecology (1 paper)DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (1 paper)MmSAI (1 paper)Australian Journal of Plant Physiology (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

C. Field

5 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

C. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 72
  • Global and Planetary Change 120
  • Atmospheric Science 61
  • Plant Science 62
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 29
Replace R. L. Dougherty with:
R. L. Dougherty United States
Timothy A. Batz United States
Iris Kuhlmann Germany
María Soledad Jiménez Argentina
Mark Broadmeadow United Kingdom
Polona Hafner Slovenia
Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami Bolivia
R. J. Kohut United States
Mykola Korol Ukraine
Luke A. Wilson United States
C. Field relative to R. L. Dougherty United States R. L. Dougherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
R. L. Dougherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Field. The network helps show where C. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside C. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Field Line = papers co-authored together C. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 199483
2 198868
3
Species of the genus Piper provide a model to study how plants can grow in different kinds of rainforest habitats
19939
4
Solar and climatic effects on 10 Be
20051
5
Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal: Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky
20171
6 20250

About C. Field

C. Field is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 162 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (1 paper), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (1 paper), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (1 paper) and Tree-ring climate responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (72 citations), Global and Planetary Change (120 citations), Atmospheric Science (61 citations), Plant Science (62 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (29 citations). C. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Goulden, Karel Mach, Gavin A. Schmidt and D. Howe. Their work appears in journals such as Interciencia, Functional Ecology, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), MmSAI and Australian Journal of Plant Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact