Interciencia

1.8k papers and 9.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Interciencia in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Interciencia usually cover Plant Science (376 papers), Food Science (242 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (233 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and soil sciences (195 papers), Agricultural and Food Production Studies (104 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interciencia are Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Philip M. Fearnside, José Luís Villaseñor, Emilio Rodríguez-Ponce, Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves, Alberto Kioharu Nishida, Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena, Florencia Montagnini, Eraldo Medeiros Costa Neto and Kenneth W. Ford.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Interciencia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interciencia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interciencia.

Countries where authors publish in Interciencia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interciencia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interciencia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interciencia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025