Mark Broadmeadow
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Forest Management and Policy
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 3
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 2
- Forest Management and Policy 1
-
- Plant responses to elevated CO2 4
- Co-authors
- Olevi Kull (1 shared paper)Patrick Meir (1 shared paper)Bart Kruijt (1 shared paper)Gail Taylor (1 shared paper)Bruno Lasserre (1 shared paper)Erkki Tomppo (1 shared paper)Emil Cienciala (1 shared paper)Arnór Snorrason (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Phytologist (2 papers)Silva Fennica (1 paper)Biogeosciences (1 paper)Trees (1 paper)Irish forestry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomEstoniaItaly
In The Last Decade
Mark Broadmeadow
8 papers receiving 187 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Global and Planetary Change 136
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 65
- Plant Science 119
- Atmospheric Science 49
- Environmental Engineering 36
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Broadmeadow
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Broadmeadow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Broadmeadow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Broadmeadow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Broadmeadow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Broadmeadow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Broadmeadow. The network helps show where Mark Broadmeadow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Broadmeadow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 6 | Projections of emissions and removals from the LULUCF sector to 2050 | 2014 | 4 |
| 7 | Climate change - the evidence so far and predictions for tree growth. | 1998 | 1 |
| 8 | 2013 | 1 |
About Mark Broadmeadow
Mark Broadmeadow is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Atmospheric Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant responses to elevated CO2 (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1 paper), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1 paper) and Forest Management and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (136 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (65 citations), Plant Science (119 citations), Atmospheric Science (49 citations) and Environmental Engineering (36 citations). Mark Broadmeadow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Estonia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Olevi Kull, Patrick Meir, Bart Kruijt, Gail Taylor, Bruno Lasserre, Erkki Tomppo, Emil Cienciala, Arnór Snorrason, Göran Ståhl and Tibor Priwitzer. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Silva Fennica, Biogeosciences, Trees and Irish forestry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.