John T. Scholz

7.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 4.8k citations indexed

About

John T. Scholz is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, John T. Scholz has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 4.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in John T. Scholz's work include Regulation and Compliance Studies (13 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (11 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers). John T. Scholz is often cited by papers focused on Regulation and Compliance Studies (13 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (11 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers). John T. Scholz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. John T. Scholz's co-authors include Mark Lubell, Ramiro Berardo, Wayne B. Gray, Neil Pinney, Mihriye Méte, Mark Schneider, Denisa Mindruta, Mark Schneider, Bruce Stiftel and Kathleen M. McGraw and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Political Science Review and American Journal of Political Science.

In The Last Decade

John T. Scholz

53 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Self‐Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries

2010 399 citations Ramiro Berardo, John T. Scholz American Journal of Political Science profile →

Peers

John T. Scholz

SPS

EE

PSIR

SM

PA

Aseem Prakash United States

Archon Fung United States

Vincent Ostrom United States

Geoffrey McNicoll United States

Peter M. Haas United States

Roger G. Noll United States

Wilfred Beckerman United Kingdom

Fritz W. Scharpf Germany

Beth A. Simmons United States

Nik Theodore United States

Aseem Prakash United States

John T. Scholz

2.2k ×1.4

SPS

1.6k ×1.2

EE

1.0k ×0.8

PSIR

4.1k ×3.4

SM

507 ×0.5

PA

Citations per year, relative to John T. Scholz John T. Scholz (= 1×) peers Aseem Prakash

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Scholz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Scholz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Scholz. The network helps show where John T. Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Scholz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Scholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Scholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Scholz. John T. Scholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Lubell, Mark, Jack Mewhirter, Ramiro Berardo, & John T. Scholz. (2016). Transaction Costs and the Perceived Effectiveness of Complex Institutional Systems. Public Administration Review. 77(5). 668–680. 111 indexed citations

2.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (2010). Social Capital in Coordination Experiments: Risk, Trust and Position. OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale). 4 indexed citations

3.

Scholz, John T., Richard C. Feiock, & T. K. Ahn. (2006). Policy Networks and Institutional Collective Action: A Research Agenda. DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University). 3 indexed citations

4.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (2005). Cooptation or Transformation? Local Policy Networks and Federal Regulatory Enforcement. American Journal of Political Science. 50(1). 81–97. 119 indexed citations

5.

Scholz, John T.. (2003). Contractual Compliance and the Federal Income Tax System. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 13(1). 139–203. 9 indexed citations

6.

Lubell, Mark & John T. Scholz. (2001). Cooperation, Reciprocity, and the Collective-Action Heuristic. American Journal of Political Science. 45(1). 160–160. 81 indexed citations

7.

Scholz, John T.. (1993). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. By Ian Ayres and John Braithwaite. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. 205p. $39.95.. American Political Science Review. 87(3). 782–783. 4 indexed citations

8.

Scholz, John T., Kathleen M. McGraw, & Marco R. Steenbergen. (1992). Will taxpayers ever like taxes?. Journal of Economic Psychology. 13(4). 625–656. 16 indexed citations

9.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (1991). The 1991 Parliamentary Elections in Nepal: Political Freedom and Stability. Asian Survey. 31(11). 1040–1060. 5 indexed citations

10.

McGraw, Kathleen M. & John T. Scholz. (1991). Appeals to Civic Virtue Versus Attention to Self-Interest: Effects on Tax Compliance. Law & Society Review. 25(3). 471–498. 98 indexed citations

11.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (1991). Street-Level Political Controls Over Federal Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review. 85(3). 829–850. 124 indexed citations

12.

Roth, Jeffrey A. & John T. Scholz. (1989). Social science perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks. 22 indexed citations

13.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (1986). Regulatory Enforcement in a Federalist System. American Political Science Review. 80(4). 1249–1270. 196 indexed citations

14.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (1985). Nepal's Politics of Referendum.. Pacific Affairs. 58(4). 730–730. 1 indexed citations

15.

Scholz, John T.. (1984). In Search of Regulatory Alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 4(1). 113–113. 4 indexed citations

16.

Scholz, John T.. (1984). Cooperation, Deterrence, and the Ecology of Regulatory Enforcement. Law & Society Review. 18(2). 179–224. 191 indexed citations

17.

Scholz, John T.. (1984). Reliability, Responsiveness, and Regulatory Policy. Public Administration Review. 44(2). 145–145. 13 indexed citations

18.

Rose, Leo E., et al.. (1981). Nepal. Profile of a Himalayan Kingdom.. Pacific Affairs. 54(1). 171–171. 2 indexed citations

19.

Scholz, John T., et al.. (1981). Nepal in Crisis. Growth and Stagnation at the Periphery.. Pacific Affairs. 54(4). 749–749. 149 indexed citations

20.

Scholz, John T.. (1977). Nepal in 1976: Problems with India Threaten Birendra's New Order. Asian Survey. 17(2). 201–207. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact