Brooke A. Napier
- Molecular Biology
- Molecular Medicine top 1%
- Genetics top 10%
- Immunology
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- David S. WeissEileen M. BurdAnna C. LlewellynDenise M. MonackCrystal L. JonesVictor I. BandMax R. SchroederTimothy R. Sampson
- Topics
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers)Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers)Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe Journal of Experimental MedicineThe Journal of Immunology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Brooke A. Napier
23 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Molecular Biology 650
- Molecular Medicine 306
- Genetics 199
- Immunology 199
- Epidemiology 173
Countries citing papers authored by Brooke A. Napier
This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke A. Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke A. Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke A. Napier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke A. Napier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke A. Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke A. Napier. The network helps show where Brooke A. Napier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brooke A. Napier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brooke A. Napier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brooke A. Napier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brooke A. Napier. Brooke A. Napier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 144 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 165 | |
| 11 | 117 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 50 | |
| 14 | 75 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 87 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 109 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Brooke A. Napier
Brooke A. Napier is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers) and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (306 citations), Endocrinology (160 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations). Brooke A. Napier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David S. Weiss, Eileen M. Burd, Anna C. Llewellyn, Denise M. Monack, Crystal L. Jones, Victor I. Band, Max R. Schroeder, Timothy R. Sampson, Liliana M. Massis and Jan Pohl. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.