Brielle R. Ferguson
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wen‐Jun GaoJohn R. HuguenardMark HorowitzRachael L. NeveKatherine E. DeLoachDrew FriedmannJing RenRan Chen
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Brielle R. Ferguson
9 papers receiving 949 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 547
- Cognitive Neuroscience 403
- Molecular Biology 291
- Social Psychology 131
- Behavioral Neuroscience 105
Countries citing papers authored by Brielle R. Ferguson
This map shows the geographic impact of Brielle R. Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brielle R. Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brielle R. Ferguson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brielle R. Ferguson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brielle R. Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brielle R. Ferguson. The network helps show where Brielle R. Ferguson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brielle R. Ferguson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brielle R. Ferguson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brielle R. Ferguson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brielle R. Ferguson. Brielle R. Ferguson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | Anatomically Defined and Functionally Distinct Dorsal Raphe Serotonin Sub-systemsbreakdown → | 306 |
| 4 | PV Interneurons: Critical Regulators of E/I Balance for Prefrontal Cortex-Dependent Behavior and Psychiatric Disordersbreakdown → | 401 |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 123 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 59 |
About Brielle R. Ferguson
Brielle R. Ferguson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (91 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (547 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (105 citations). Brielle R. Ferguson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Wen‐Jun Gao, John R. Huguenard, Mark Horowitz, Rachael L. Neve, Katherine E. DeLoach, Drew Friedmann, Jing Ren, Ran Chen, Jing Xiong and Cindy D. Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.