Dennis Kätzel
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Gero MiesenböckDimitri M. KullmannAlexei M. BygraveDavid M. BannermanBoris V. ZemelmanChristina BuetferingMarkus WölfelBastiaan van der Veen
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNature Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dennis Kätzel
24 papers receiving 926 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 642
- Cognitive Neuroscience 458
- Molecular Biology 255
- Neurology 83
- Social Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Kätzel
This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Kätzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Kätzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Kätzel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Kätzel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Kätzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Kätzel. The network helps show where Dennis Kätzel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Kätzel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Kätzel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Kätzel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Kätzel. Dennis Kätzel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 187 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 84 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 176 |
About Dennis Kätzel
Dennis Kätzel is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (642 citations), Biological Psychiatry (70 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (458 citations). Dennis Kätzel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gero Miesenböck, Dimitri M. Kullmann, Alexei M. Bygrave, David M. Bannerman, Boris V. Zemelman, Christina Buetfering, Markus Wölfel, Bastiaan van der Veen, Elizabeth Nicholson and Birgit Liss. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.