Bridget Jones
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 2
- Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues 1
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 3
- Co-authors
- Kate Gleeson (1 shared paper)Emma Williams (1 shared paper)Jan R. Oyebode (5 shared papers)Heather Gage (9 shared papers)Janet Carter (4 shared papers)Jacqueline Parkes (4 shared papers)Mary O’Malley (3 shared papers)Jenny La Fontaine (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (2 papers)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2 papers)Patient Education and Counseling (1 paper)Autism (1 paper)Health & Social Care in the Community (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyPortugal
In The Last Decade
Bridget Jones
10 papers receiving 241 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Psychiatry and Mental health 102
- Cognitive Neuroscience 67
- Clinical Psychology 63
- General Health Professions 49
- Education 38
Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Jones. The network helps show where Bridget Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bridget Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 0 |
About Bridget Jones
Bridget Jones is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 12 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (102 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations), Clinical Psychology (63 citations), General Health Professions (49 citations) and Education (38 citations). Bridget Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Kate Gleeson, Emma Williams, Jan R. Oyebode, Heather Gage, Janet Carter, Jacqueline Parkes, Mary O’Malley, Jenny La Fontaine, Peter Williams and Saïd Lebbah. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Patient Education and Counseling, Autism and Health & Social Care in the Community.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.