Emma Williams
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vasudevi ReddyAlan CostallAmy Vaughan Van HeckeAlan EmondKate ThomasKate GleesonLaura M. SimondsC. Smith
- Topics
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (11 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryJournal of Autism and Developmental DisordersDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma Williams
20 papers receiving 669 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 533
- Clinical Psychology 283
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 234
- Education 217
- Social Psychology 108
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Williams. The network helps show where Emma Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Williams. Emma Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 78 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 142 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | 113 | |
| 18 | 135 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Emma Williams
Emma Williams is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (11 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (533 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (234 citations) and Clinical Psychology (283 citations). Emma Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vasudevi Reddy, Alan Costall, Amy Vaughan Van Hecke, Alan Emond, Kate Thomas, Kate Gleeson, Laura M. Simonds, C. Smith, Karen Bryan and Adrian Coyle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.