Bridget Copley
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Papers in
-
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 9
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 1
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 1
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 3
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 3
- Journals
- Linguistic Inquiry (1 paper)Glossa a journal of general linguistics (1 paper)Linguistics and Philosophy (1 paper)SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository (2 papers)Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Bridget Copley
10 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Language and Linguistics 177
- Linguistics and Language 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 98
- Philosophy 66
- Artificial Intelligence 76
Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Copley
This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Copley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Copley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Copley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Copley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Copley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Copley. The network helps show where Bridget Copley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Bridget Copley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 4 | The emergence of Merge and recursion in the transition from single words to sentences | 2015 | 1 |
| 5 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 102 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 8 | What should "should" mean? | 2006 | 16 |
| 9 | Ordering and Reasoning | 2005 | 6 |
| 10 | A Linguistic Argument for Indeterministic Futures | 2002 | 3 |
| 11 | 2001 | 4 |
About Bridget Copley
Bridget Copley is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (177 citations), Linguistics and Language (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (98 citations), Philosophy (66 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (76 citations). Bridget Copley has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Fabienne Martin, Heidi Harley, Phillip Wolff, Jason Shepard, Isabelle Roy and Lorraine McCune. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistic Inquiry, Glossa a journal of general linguistics, Linguistics and Philosophy, SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository and Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.