Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Causal reasoning with forces
2015695 citationsPhillip Wolff, Aron K. Barbeyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Wolff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Wolff. The network helps show where Phillip Wolff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Wolff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Wolff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Wolff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Wolff. Phillip Wolff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wolff, Phillip, et al.. (2016). What Causal Illusions Might Tell us About the Identification of Causes.. Cognitive Science.2 indexed citations
8.
Wolff, Phillip, et al.. (2015). Representations of Time Affect Willingness to Wait for Future Rewards.. Cognitive Science.
9.
Wolff, Phillip, Samuel Ritter, & Kevin J. Holmes. (2014). Causation, Force, and the Sense of Touch. Cognitive Science. 36(36).2 indexed citations
10.
Shepard, Jason & Phillip Wolff. (2013). Intentionality, Evaluative Judgments, and Causal Structure. Cognitive Science. 35(35).2 indexed citations
11.
Holmes, Kevin J. & Phillip Wolff. (2013). When Is Language a Window into the Mind? Looking Beyond Words to Infer Conceptual Categories. Cognitive Science. 35(35).1 indexed citations
12.
Holmes, Kevin J. & Phillip Wolff. (2011). Simulating Realism in Language Comprehension. Cognitive Science. 33(33).5 indexed citations
13.
Holmes, Kevin J. & Phillip Wolff. (2010). Simulation from Schematics: Dorsal Stream Processing and the Perception of Implied Motion. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).10 indexed citations
14.
Malt, Barbara C. & Phillip Wolff. (2010). Words and the mind : how words capture human experience. Oxford University Press eBooks.79 indexed citations
15.
Wolff, Phillip, Aron K. Barbey, & Matthew Hausknecht. (2010). For want of a nail: How absences cause events.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 139(2). 191–221.54 indexed citations
16.
Wolff, Phillip & Kevin J. Holmes. (2010). Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science. 2(3). 253–265.149 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.