Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Biological control and integrated pest management in organic and conventional systems
Countries citing papers authored by Brian P. Baker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian P. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian P. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian P. Baker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian P. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian P. Baker. The network helps show where Brian P. Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian P. Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian P. Baker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian P. Baker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brian P. Baker. Brian P. Baker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baker, Brian P., Brigid Meints, & Patrick M. Hayes. (2019). Improving Barley for Organic Producers: What Do Organic Producers Want?. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).1 indexed citations
2.
Baker, Brian P. & Jennifer Grant. (2018). Active Ingredients Eligible for Minimum Risk Pesticide Use: Overview of the Profiles. eCommons (Cornell University).5 indexed citations
3.
Baker, Brian P. & Jennifer Grant. (2018). Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Profile. eCommons (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
4.
Baker, Brian P. & Jennifer Grant. (2018). Cottonseed Oil Profile. eCommons (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
5.
Baker, Brian P. & Jennifer Grant. (2018). Mint and Mint Oil Profile. eCommons (Cornell University).
6.
Baker, Brian P. & Jennifer Grant. (2018). Rosemary & Rosemary Oil Profile. eCommons (Cornell University).
7.
Baker, Brian P. & Jennifer Grant. (2018). Potassium Sorbate Profile. eCommons (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Baker, Brian P.. (2015). Action Plan of TIPI, the Technology Innovation Platform of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM - Organics International). Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).6 indexed citations
Baker, Brian P.. (2012). Flags of Convenience and the Gulf Oil Spill: Problems and Proposed Solutions. Houston journal of international law. 34(3). 687.1 indexed citations
15.
Baker, Brian P.. (2008). Commercial availability of organic seeds: certifier perspectives.. 55–60.1 indexed citations
16.
Speiser, Bernhard, Cristina Micheloni, C. Stopes, et al.. (2005). Evaluating inputs for organic farming - a new system. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.