Brian Black

36 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Brian Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Sociology and Political Science 49
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 42
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 39
  • Religious studies 28
  • Political Science and International Relations 27
Replace Mette M. High with:
Mette M. High United Kingdom
Mathew Humphrey United Kingdom
Robert Holländer United States
Elisabet Dueholm Rasch Netherlands
M. D. Usher United Kingdom
Patrik Oskarsson Sweden
Tristan Partridge United States
Kim de Rijke Australia
Craig Morris United States
Elizabeth Wilson United Kingdom
Brian Black relative to Mette M. High United Kingdom Mette M. High's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Mette M. High · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Black. The network helps show where Brian Black may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian Black

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian Black. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian Black based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian Black. Brian Black is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 5
3 1
4
Priests, kings, and women in the early Upaniṣads : the character of the self in ancient India
0
5 3
6 16
7 0
8 5
9 30
10 1
11
A legacy of extraction: Ethics in the energy landscape of Appalachia
1
12 2
13 2
14 1
15 1
16 12
17
Construction sites: Environment, region, and technology in historical stories
2
18
"A Triumph of Individualism": The Rule of Capture and the Ethic of Extraction in Pennsylvania's Oil Boom
1
19
Recasting the Unalterable Order of Nature: Photography and the First Oil Boom
3
20 3

About Brian Black

Brian Black is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Religious studies and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 46 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (13 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (11 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (8 citations), Religious studies (28 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (20 citations). Brian Black has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Craig E. Colten, David M. Hassenzahl, G. J. Weisel, Ahmed Guessoum, Richard Flarend, Antal van den Bosch and Paul McKevitt. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Review, Technology and Culture and The Journal of Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026