Brett O. Gardner

657 total citations
33 papers, 427 citations indexed

About

Brett O. Gardner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brett O. Gardner has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 427 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Brett O. Gardner's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Brett O. Gardner is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Brett O. Gardner collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Brett O. Gardner's co-authors include Jorge Sosa, Daniel C. Murrie, Marcus T. Boccaccini, John F. Edens, Sharon M. Kelley, Itiel E. Dror, Robert J. Cramer, Katrina A. Rufino, E M K Bergström and P J Teddy and has published in prestigious journals such as Preventive Medicine, Psychological Assessment and Journal of Personality Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Brett O. Gardner

29 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brett O. Gardner United States 12 158 90 85 58 31 33 427
Alison Rose Canada 12 130 0.8× 36 0.4× 25 0.3× 75 1.3× 15 0.5× 31 405
Ana Torres Portugal 11 54 0.3× 38 0.4× 26 0.3× 41 0.7× 6 0.2× 38 358
Emma Kirkpatrick United Kingdom 9 33 0.2× 34 0.4× 37 0.4× 45 0.8× 15 0.5× 10 358
Sabrina M. Richardson United States 5 74 0.5× 40 0.4× 32 0.4× 36 0.6× 11 0.4× 13 293
Shannon Stock United States 12 47 0.3× 30 0.3× 41 0.5× 23 0.4× 7 0.2× 31 489
Mariko Hasegawa Japan 8 109 0.7× 152 1.7× 41 0.5× 39 0.7× 4 0.1× 15 436
Robert Spillane Australia 10 40 0.3× 37 0.4× 42 0.5× 59 1.0× 10 0.3× 59 354
Joaquín Lago‐Ballesteros Spain 15 22 0.1× 69 0.8× 37 0.4× 118 2.0× 21 0.7× 37 1.5k
Esther Lázaro Spain 11 42 0.3× 25 0.3× 24 0.3× 18 0.3× 15 0.5× 46 326
Marco Zuffranieri Italy 10 98 0.6× 15 0.2× 15 0.2× 40 0.7× 20 0.6× 14 327

Countries citing papers authored by Brett O. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brett O. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett O. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett O. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brett O. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett O. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett O. Gardner. The network helps show where Brett O. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brett O. Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brett O. Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brett O. Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brett O. Gardner. Brett O. Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2024). Examiner consistency in perceptions of fingerprint minutia rarity. Forensic Science International. 364. 112244–112244. 1 indexed citations
2.
Guarnera, Lucy A., Daniel C. Murrie, Brett O. Gardner, & Scott D. Bender. (2024). Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?. Law and Human Behavior. 48(5-6). 545–563.
3.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2023). What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners. Forensic Science International. 344. 111598–111598. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2022). Perceptions of blind proficiency testing among latent print examiners. Science & Justice. 63(2). 200–205. 2 indexed citations
5.
Garrett, Brandon L., et al.. (2021). Judges and forensic science education: A national survey. Forensic Science International. 321. 110714–110714. 13 indexed citations
6.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2021). Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance. Forensic Science International. 324. 110823–110823. 7 indexed citations
7.
Murrie, Daniel C., et al.. (2020). Competency to stand trial evaluations: A state‐wide review of court‐ordered reports. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 38(1). 32–50. 4 indexed citations
8.
9.
Murrie, Daniel C., et al.. (2020). The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia competence to stand trial evaluations.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 28(1). 53–66. 3 indexed citations
10.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2020). Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory. Forensic Science International. 319. 110642–110642. 2 indexed citations
11.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2019). Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?. Forensic Science International. 297. 236–242. 15 indexed citations
12.
Murrie, Daniel C., Brett O. Gardner, Sharon M. Kelley, & Itiel E. Dror. (2019). Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts. Forensic Science International. 302. 109887–109887. 30 indexed citations
13.
Kelley, Sharon M., et al.. (2019). How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality. Science & Justice. 60(2). 120–127. 8 indexed citations
14.
Gardner, Brett O., Marcus T. Boccaccini, & Daniel C. Murrie. (2018). Which PCL-R Scores Best Predict Forensic Clinicians’ Opinions of Offender Risk?. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 45(9). 1404–1419. 1 indexed citations
15.
Gardner, Brett O. & Marcus T. Boccaccini. (2017). Does the Convergent Validity of the PAI Antisocial Features Scale Depend on Offender Response Style?. Journal of Personality Assessment. 99(5). 481–493. 5 indexed citations
16.
Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2016). Can preferences in information processing aid in understanding suicide risk among emerging adults?. Death Studies. 40(6). 383–391. 15 indexed citations
17.
Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2016). A Validation Study of the Need for Affect Questionnaire–Short Form in Legal Contexts. Journal of Personality Assessment. 99(1). 67–77. 8 indexed citations
18.
Gardner, Brett O., et al.. (2014). Personality Assessment Inventory scores as predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A meta-analytic review.. Psychological Assessment. 27(2). 534–544. 65 indexed citations
19.
Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2013). The Role of and Challenges for Psychologists in Physician Assisted Suicide. Death Studies. 38(9). 582–588. 13 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alison Rose Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana Torres Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emma Kirkpatrick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabrina M. Richardson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shannon Stock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mariko Hasegawa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Spillane Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joaquín Lago‐Ballesteros Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Esther Lázaro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marco Zuffranieri
Rankless by CCL
2026