Bret Harsham

651 total citations
13 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Bret Harsham is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Bret Harsham has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Bret Harsham's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (5 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers). Bret Harsham is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (5 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers). Bret Harsham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Bret Harsham's co-authors include Željko Medenica, Shinji Watanabe, Chiori Hori, Clifton Forlines, Yi Luan, Takaaki Hori, Donald L. Fisher, Gautam Divekar, Michael Knödler and Matthew R. E. Romoser and has published in prestigious journals such as Accident Analysis & Prevention, Computer Speech & Language and Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

In The Last Decade

Bret Harsham

12 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bret Harsham United States 10 103 51 48 37 32 13 184
Chia-Ming Chang Japan 7 218 2.1× 119 2.3× 64 1.3× 25 0.7× 84 2.6× 32 337
Carl A. Pickering United Kingdom 9 196 1.9× 53 1.0× 126 2.6× 14 0.4× 53 1.7× 13 306
Koki Toda Japan 7 204 2.0× 107 2.1× 81 1.7× 13 0.4× 79 2.5× 13 295
Nele Rußwinkel Germany 8 132 1.3× 46 0.9× 30 0.6× 56 1.5× 27 0.8× 31 249
Andreas Lüdtke Germany 9 97 0.9× 42 0.8× 17 0.4× 14 0.4× 46 1.4× 35 177
Sourabh Vora United States 3 44 0.4× 22 0.4× 69 1.4× 13 0.4× 44 1.4× 3 152
Joshua Domeyer United States 10 253 2.5× 191 3.7× 47 1.0× 30 0.8× 100 3.1× 27 362
Tanmay Randhavane United States 10 53 0.5× 19 0.4× 81 1.7× 37 1.0× 48 1.5× 15 230
Charlie Hewitt United Kingdom 4 71 0.7× 20 0.4× 12 0.3× 16 0.4× 55 1.7× 8 174
João Emílio Almeida Portugal 9 32 0.3× 22 0.4× 26 0.5× 13 0.4× 27 0.8× 15 162

Countries citing papers authored by Bret Harsham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bret Harsham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret Harsham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret Harsham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bret Harsham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret Harsham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret Harsham. The network helps show where Bret Harsham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bret Harsham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bret Harsham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bret Harsham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bret Harsham. Bret Harsham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Nishikawa, Hiroki, Takumi Yamamoto, Bret Harsham, et al.. (2020). Analysis of Malicious Email Detection using Cialdini’s Principles. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hori, Takaaki, et al.. (2018). Adversarial training and decoding strategies for end-to-end neural conversation models. Computer Speech & Language. 54. 122–139. 10 indexed citations
3.
Hori, Chiori, et al.. (2016). Driver confusion status detection using recurrent neural networks. 2008. 1–6. 12 indexed citations
4.
Hori, Takaaki, Hai Wang, Chiori Hori, et al.. (2016). Dialog state tracking with attention-based sequence-to-sequence learning. abs 1409 473. 552–558. 11 indexed citations
5.
Luan, Yi, Shinji Watanabe, & Bret Harsham. (2015). Efficient learning for spoken language understanding tasks with word embedding based pre-training. 1398–1402. 10 indexed citations
6.
Harsham, Bret, Shinji Watanabe, Alan Esenther, et al.. (2015). Driver prediction to improve interaction with in-vehicle HMI. 1–8. 4 indexed citations
7.
Zhang, Jingyi, et al.. (2012). Evaluation of Two Types of In-Vehicle Music Retrieval and Navigation Systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 56(1). 1992–1996. 1 indexed citations
8.
Harsham, Bret, et al.. (2011). Evaluating the usability of a head-up display for selection from choice lists in cars. 39–46. 42 indexed citations
9.
Harsham, Bret, et al.. (2011). Investigating HUDs for the Presentation of Choice Lists in Car Navigation Systems. 10 indexed citations
10.
Pradhan, Anuj K., Bret Harsham, Gautam Divekar, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of different speech and touch interfaces to in-vehicle music retrieval systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(3). 913–920. 26 indexed citations
11.
Harsham, Bret, et al.. (2010). Contextual push-to-talk. 113–122. 10 indexed citations
12.
Harsham, Bret, et al.. (2009). Developing a low-cost driving simulator for the evaluation of in-vehicle technologies. 51–54. 34 indexed citations
13.
Dietz, Paul, Bret Harsham, Clifton Forlines, et al.. (2005). DT controls. 245–252. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026