Brenda Clarke
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management 2
- Public Administration top 10%
- Social Work Education and Practice 2
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 13
- Education top 5%
- Reflective Practices in Education 4
- Adult and Continuing Education Topics 2
- Healthcare innovation and challenges 2
- Higher Education Learning Practices 2
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 6
Brenda Clarke
23 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Research and Theory 76
- Public Administration 51
- General Health Professions 234
- Education 188
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
Countries citing papers authored by Brenda Clarke
This map shows the geographic impact of Brenda Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brenda Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brenda Clarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brenda Clarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brenda Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brenda Clarke. The network helps show where Brenda Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Brenda Clarke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 58 | |
| 10 | Learning together: Student and staff experience of interprofessional groups | 2005 | 8 |
| 11 | Learning together on-line: Student and staff experience of interprofessional on-line groups | 2005 | 2 |
| 12 | The effects of age, gender and education on student experience of interprofessional learning | 2004 | 1 |
| 13 | They'll still get the bodily care. Discourse of care and relationships between nurses and health care assistants | 2000 | 1 |
| 14 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 66 | |
| 17 | The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Flexible Modes of Learning in Post-Registration Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Education and Practice. | 1996 | 2 |
| 18 | 1994 | 75 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 26 |
About Brenda Clarke
Brenda Clarke is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Leadership and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (13 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers) and Nursing education and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (76 citations), Public Administration (51 citations) and General Health Professions (234 citations). Brenda Clarke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chris James, Norma Daykin, John Albarran, Katherine Pollard, Judith Thomas, Margaret E. Miers, Margaret Miers, Chris James, Linda Hunt and Nicola Eaton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Medical Education and International Journal of Nursing Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.