Bidyut Chakrabarty
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- Indian History and Philosophy (24 papers)South Asian Studies and Conflicts (24 papers)Indian Economic and Social Development (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Bidyut Chakrabarty
48 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Political Science and International Relations 122
- Philosophy 61
- Anthropology 43
- Economics and Econometrics 36
Countries citing papers authored by Bidyut Chakrabarty
This map shows the geographic impact of Bidyut Chakrabarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bidyut Chakrabarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bidyut Chakrabarty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bidyut Chakrabarty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bidyut Chakrabarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bidyut Chakrabarty. The network helps show where Bidyut Chakrabarty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bidyut Chakrabarty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bidyut Chakrabarty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bidyut Chakrabarty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bidyut Chakrabarty. Bidyut Chakrabarty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | The Socio-political Ideas of BR Ambedkar: Liberal constitutionalism in a creative mould | 5 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | Gandhi's Hind Swaraj: A Critique of Received Wisdom on Freedom, Democratization and Rights | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Indian Politics and Society since Independence: Events, Processes and Ideology | 14 |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | Administrative change and innovation : a reader | 1 |
| 13 | The Partition of Bengal and Assam, 1932-1947: Contour of Freedom | 9 |
| 14 | Communal identity in India : its construction and articulation in the twentieth century | 5 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | Subhas Chandra Bose and Middle Class Radicalism: A Study in Indian Nationalism, 1928-1940 | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Bidyut Chakrabarty
Bidyut Chakrabarty is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian History and Philosophy (24 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (24 papers) and Indian Economic and Social Development (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations), Philosophy (61 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (122 citations). Bidyut Chakrabarty has collaborated with scholars based in India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rajendra Pandey, Clayborne Carson, Rajendra K. Pandey, Arindam Roy and Biswamoy Pati. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, Modern Asian Studies and International Journal of Urban Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.