Priya Chacko
Impact in
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts
- Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
- Development top 5%
- International Development and Aid
Papers in
-
- International Development and Aid 6
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy 10
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts 7
Priya Chacko
34 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Political Science and International Relations 270
- Development 39
- Sociology and Political Science 216
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 30
- Anthropology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Priya Chacko
This map shows the geographic impact of Priya Chacko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Priya Chacko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Priya Chacko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Priya Chacko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Priya Chacko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Priya Chacko. The network helps show where Priya Chacko may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Priya Chacko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 9 | Implementing the Indo-Pacific: Japan’s region building initiatives | 2019 | 1 |
| 10 | 2018 | 107 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 14 | New Regional Geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific : Drivers, dynamics and consequences | 2016 | 5 |
| 15 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 18 | India and the Indo-Pacific: an emerging regional vision | 2012 | 4 |
| 19 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 8 |
About Priya Chacko
Priya Chacko is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Demography and Philosophy, having authored 35 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (10 papers), Global trade and economics (7 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (7 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (7 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (6 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (6 papers), International Development and Aid (6 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (270 citations), Development (39 citations), Sociology and Political Science (216 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (30 citations) and Anthropology (31 citations). Priya Chacko has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kanishka Jayasuriya, Peter Mayer, Jeffrey D. Wilson, Sheila A. Smith and Kei Koga. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal Of International Affairs, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Critical Asian Studies, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations and International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.