Beth Ford

405 total citations
9 papers, 314 citations indexed

About

Beth Ford is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Ford has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 314 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Genetics, 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Beth Ford's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). Beth Ford is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). Beth Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States and Spain. Beth Ford's co-authors include Kimberly A. Kaphingst, Sapna Syngal, Elena M. Stoffel, Christina Lachance, Vincent C. Allen, Lori A.H. Erby, Rowena Mercado, Stephen B. Gruber, Jonathan P. Terdiman and Peggy Conrad and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Beth Ford

9 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Beth Ford United States	6	166	104	78	76	47	9	314
Courtney D. Storm United States	7	263 1.6×	91 0.9×	74 0.9×	71 0.9×	31 0.7×	9	434
Carol A. Christianson United States	12	328 2.0×	42 0.4×	122 1.6×	60 0.8×	51 1.1×	20	446
Karen Powell United States	15	374 2.3×	83 0.8×	150 1.9×	109 1.4×	94 2.0×	22	565
Robin Lee United States	9	198 1.2×	25 0.2×	40 0.5×	39 0.5×	48 1.0×	15	305
Sabrina A. Suckiel United States	13	323 1.9×	38 0.4×	142 1.8×	21 0.3×	43 0.9×	23	467
Elana Levinson United States	6	195 1.2×	32 0.3×	62 0.8×	52 0.7×	11 0.2×	9	282
Amelia K. Smit Australia	13	212 1.3×	19 0.2×	84 1.1×	129 1.7×	30 0.6×	47	421
Erica Pitini Italy	10	150 0.9×	24 0.2×	63 0.8×	29 0.4×	31 0.7×	30	304
Latrice Landry United States	7	185 1.1×	20 0.2×	110 1.4×	19 0.3×	37 0.8×	15	344
Tiffany Boughtwood Australia	11	342 2.1×	30 0.3×	189 2.4×	17 0.2×	68 1.4×	29	611

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Ford

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Ford

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Ford. The network helps show where Beth Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Ford. Beth Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Ford, Beth. (2015). Open Wide the Gates of Legal Access. Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon). 1 indexed citations

2.

Lachance, Christina, Lori A.H. Erby, Beth Ford, Vincent C. Allen, & Kimberly A. Kaphingst. (2010). Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers. Genetics in Medicine. 12(5). 304–312. 89 indexed citations

3.

Stoffel, Elena M., Rowena Mercado, Wendy Kohlmann, et al.. (2010). Prevalence and Predictors of Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 105(8). 1851–1860. 51 indexed citations

4.

Ford, Beth & Kimberly A. Kaphingst. (2009). Lay interpersonal sources for health information related to beliefs about the modifiability of cancer risk. Cancer Causes & Control. 20(10). 1975–1983. 24 indexed citations

5.

Grover, Shilpa, Elena M. Stoffel, Rowena Mercado, et al.. (2009). Colorectal Cancer Risk Perception on the Basis of Genetic Test Results in Individuals at Risk for Lynch Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(24). 3981–3986. 20 indexed citations

6.

Stoffel, Elena M., Beth Ford, Rowena Mercado, et al.. (2008). Sharing Genetic Test Results in Lynch Syndrome: Communication With Close and Distant Relatives. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 6(3). 333–338. 92 indexed citations

7.

Ford, Beth, et al.. (2008). ICD-9-CM expert : for home health services., nursing facilities, and hospices volumes 1, 2, & 3. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

8.

Ford, Beth, James S. Evans, Elena M. Stoffel, et al.. (2006). Factors Associated with Enrollment in Cancer Genetics Research. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 15(7). 1355–1359. 35 indexed citations

9.

Ford, Beth, et al.. (2005). Factors predicting willingness to participate in cancer genetic epidemiologic research. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23(16_suppl). 6007–6007. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact