Amelia K. Smit

841 total citations
47 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

Amelia K. Smit is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology and Dermatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amelia K. Smit has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Genetics, 15 papers in Oncology and 11 papers in Dermatology. Recurrent topics in Amelia K. Smit's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (20 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (11 papers) and Skin Protection and Aging (10 papers). Amelia K. Smit is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (20 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (11 papers) and Skin Protection and Aging (10 papers). Amelia K. Smit collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Amelia K. Smit's co-authors include Anne Ε. Cust, Ainsley J. Newson, Louise Keogh, Kate Dunlop, Phyllis Butow, Georgina Fenton, Judy Kirk, Jolyn Hersch, Nicole Rankin and Rachael L. Morton and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Amelia K. Smit

42 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Amelia K. Smit
Kate Dunlop Australia
Tatiane Yanes Australia
Mbathio Dieng Australia
Julie Harris-Wai United States
Wendy Kohlmann United States
Nancy Feldman United States
Mya L. Roberson United States
Jonathan Roberts United Kingdom
John Malick United States
Kate Dunlop Australia
Amelia K. Smit
Citations per year, relative to Amelia K. Smit Amelia K. Smit (= 1×) peers Kate Dunlop

Countries citing papers authored by Amelia K. Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia K. Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia K. Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia K. Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia K. Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia K. Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia K. Smit. The network helps show where Amelia K. Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amelia K. Smit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amelia K. Smit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amelia K. Smit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amelia K. Smit. Amelia K. Smit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goldsbury, David, Yoon‐Jung Kang, Catherine Tang, et al.. (2025). Sociodemographic and health factors associated with genetic testing in Australia: insights from a cohort-based study of 45,061 participants. European Journal of Human Genetics. 33(6). 819–824.
2.
McGahan, Eugene, Tatiane Yanes, Jennifer Berkman, et al.. (2025). Utility of Germline, Somatic and ctDNA Testing in Adults With Cancer. Cancer Medicine. 14(15). e71080–e71080.
3.
Ferguson, Peter M., Serigne Lo, Helena Collgros, et al.. (2024). In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy role for early to advanced lentigo maligna melanoma spectrum: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 39(3). 555–565. 1 indexed citations
4.
Smit, Amelia K., Andrea L. Smith, David Espinoza, et al.. (2024). Adherence to melanoma screening and surveillance skin check schedules tailored to personal risk. International Journal of Cancer. 155(11). 2058–2067.
5.
Norman, Richard, Amelia K. Smit, Anne Ε. Cust, et al.. (2024). Public Preferences for Genetic and Genomic Risk-Informed Chronic Disease Screening and Early Detection: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 23(3). 395–408. 3 indexed citations
7.
Dunlop, Kate, Amelia K. Smit, Louise Keogh, et al.. (2023). Acceptability of risk-tailored cancer screening among Australian GPs: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice. 74(740). e156–e164. 3 indexed citations
8.
Smit, Amelia K., David Espinoza, Georgina Fenton, et al.. (2022). Communicating Personal Melanoma Polygenic Risk Information: Participants’ Experiences of Genetic Counseling in a Community-Based Study. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 12(10). 1581–1581. 1 indexed citations
9.
Mercado, Gabriela, et al.. (2022). Motivations and Barriers to Participation in a Randomized Trial on Melanoma Genomic Risk: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 12(10). 1704–1704. 1 indexed citations
10.
Smit, Amelia K., David Espinoza, Mary‐Anne Young, et al.. (2021). Knowledge, views and expectations for cancer polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: A cross‐sectional survey of health professionals. Clinical Genetics. 100(4). 430–439. 24 indexed citations
11.
Steinberg, Julia, Mark M. Iles, Xiaochuan Wang, et al.. (2021). Independent evaluation of melanoma polygenic risk scores in UK and Australian prospective cohorts*. British Journal of Dermatology. 186(5). 823–834. 12 indexed citations
12.
Smit, Amelia K., et al.. (2020). ‘There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs’: public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). e28–e28. 10 indexed citations
13.
Smit, Amelia K., et al.. (2020). Implementation considerations for offering personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 20(1). 1028–1028. 12 indexed citations
14.
Smit, Amelia K., Nicci Bartley, Megan Best, et al.. (2020). Family communication about genomic sequencing: A qualitative study with cancer patients and relatives. Patient Education and Counseling. 104(5). 944–952. 10 indexed citations
15.
Best, Megan, Phyllis Butow, Chris Jacobs, et al.. (2019). Who should access germline genome sequencing? A mixed methods study of patient views. Clinical Genetics. 97(2). 329–337. 4 indexed citations
16.
Smit, Amelia K., Ainsley J. Newson, Megan Best, et al.. (2018). Distress, uncertainty, and positive experiences associated with receiving information on personal genomic risk of melanoma. European Journal of Human Genetics. 26(8). 1094–1100. 16 indexed citations
17.
Cust, Anne Ε., Georgina Fenton, Amelia K. Smit, et al.. (2018). Validation of Questionnaire and Diary Measures of Time Outdoors Against an Objective Measure of Personal Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 94(4). 815–820. 11 indexed citations
18.
Fenton, Georgina, Amelia K. Smit, Louise Keogh, & Anne Ε. Cust. (2018). Exploring the emotional and behavioural reactions to receiving personalized melanoma genomic risk information: a qualitative study. British Journal of Dermatology. 180(6). 1390–1396. 11 indexed citations
19.
Smit, Amelia K., Louise Keogh, Ainsley J. Newson, et al.. (2017). Does personalized melanoma genomic risk information trigger conversations about skin cancer prevention and skin examination with family, friends and health professionals?. British Journal of Dermatology. 177(3). 779–790. 13 indexed citations
20.
Smit, Amelia K., David Espinoza, Ainsley J. Newson, et al.. (2016). A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 26(2). 212–221. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026