Bernd Löwe
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.02%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 0.02%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 105
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 47
- Co-authors
- Kurt Kroenke (18 shared papers)Robert J. Spitzer (7 shared papers)Janet B. W. Williams (5 shared papers)Wolfgang Herzog (57 shared papers)Kerstin Gräfe (9 shared papers)Elmar Brähler (19 shared papers)Janet B. W. Williams (2 shared papers)Robert L. Spitzer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (76 papers)BMJ Open (16 papers)Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (14 papers)Psychosomatic Medicine (12 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Bernd Löwe
420 papers receiving 57.9k citations
Bernd Löwe's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Applied Psychology 2.5k
- Clinical Psychology 13.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.6k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.6k
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 330
Countries citing papers authored by Bernd Löwe
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernd Löwe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernd Löwe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernd Löwe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernd Löwe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernd Löwe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernd Löwe. The network helps show where Bernd Löwe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bernd Löwe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 468 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 23860 |
| 2 | Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 3671 |
| 3 | Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 3512 |
| 4 | An Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for Anxiety and Depression: The PHQ-4 Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 3370 |
| 5 | The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 3244 |
| 6 | A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 1917 |
| 7 | Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1294 |
| 8 | Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2) Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 1177 |
| 9 | Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians? diagnoses Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 904 |
| 10 | 2004 | 656 | |
| 11 | Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 644 |
| 12 | Depression, anxiety and somatization in primary care: syndrome overlap and functional impairment Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 590 |
| 13 | The Somatic Symptom Scale–8 (SSS-8) Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 560 |
| 14 | Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 433 |
| 15 | 2000 | 424 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 311 | |
| 17 | Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 289 |
| 18 | 2001 | 287 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 272 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 225 |
About Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Hepatology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 468 papers that have together received 59.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (105 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (47 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (26 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (14 papers), Liver Diseases and Immunity (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (13 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (9 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (2.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (13.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.6k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.6k citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (330 citations). Bernd Löwe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Kroenke, Robert J. Spitzer, Janet B. W. Williams, Wolfgang Herzog, Kerstin Gräfe, Elmar Brähler, Janet B. W. Williams, Robert L. Spitzer, Patrick O. Monahan and Dieter Schellberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, BMJ Open, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychosomatic Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.