Beate Wild

141 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Beate Wild
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • General Decision Sciences 80
  • Pharmacy 62
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 71
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 146
Replace Malcolm J. Bond with:
Malcolm J. Bond Australia
Joseph Chilcot United Kingdom
Hermann Nabi France
Gareth R. Dutton United States
David S. Brody United States
Fiona C Warren United Kingdom
Gian Mauro Manzoni Italy
Leigh Alison Phillips United States
Jeannine S. Schiller United States
Frank J. Kohout United States
Beate Wild relative to Malcolm J. Bond Australia Malcolm J. Bond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Malcolm J. Bond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Wild. The network helps show where Beate Wild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beate Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Wild Line = papers co-authored together Beate Wild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 158 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013311
2 2013221
3 2010202
4 2012144
5 2000119
6 201095
7 201686
8 201383
9 200080
10 201476
11 201373
12 200963
13 201263
14 201561
15 201156
16 201654
17 200953
18 200352
19 201450
20 201249

About Beate Wild

Beate Wild is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Decision Sciences and Surgery, having authored 158 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (41 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (10 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (8 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), General Decision Sciences (80 citations), Pharmacy (62 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (71 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (146 citations). Beate Wild has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Herzog, Bernd Löwe, Stephan Zipfel, Hermann Brenner, Hans‐Christoph Friederich, Dieter Schellberg, Mechthild Hartmann, Imad Maatouk, Hans‐Helmut König and Dorothea Niehoff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, PLoS ONE, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Journal of Affective Disorders and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact