Berit Bringedal

464 citations
36 papers · 263 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Berit Bringedal

25 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Berit Bringedal
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Health Informatics 8
  • General Health Professions 125
  • Pharmacy 16
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 74
  • Health 19
Replace Emil Øversveen with:
Emil Øversveen Norway
Eugenijus Gefenas Lithuania
Douglas MacKay United States
Mark J. Cherry United States
Colin Baker United Kingdom
Anneli Hujala Finland
Robert Borst Netherlands
Dorina Simeonov Canada
Lee Adam New Zealand
David E. Kalist United States
Berit Bringedal relative to Emil Øversveen Norway Emil Øversveen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Emil Øversveen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Berit Bringedal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Berit Bringedal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Berit Bringedal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berit Bringedal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Berit Bringedal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Berit Bringedal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Berit Bringedal. The network helps show where Berit Bringedal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Berit Bringedal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Berit Bringedal Line = papers co-authored together Berit Bringedal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202148
2 201146
3 201727
4 201920
5 201117
6 201116
7 201915
8 201613
9 20227
10 20136
11 20094
12 20224
13 20174
14 20194
15 20124
16 20154
17 20243
18 20103
19 20213
20 20213

About Berit Bringedal

Berit Bringedal is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medical Services and Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare cost, quality, practices (11 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (8 citations), General Health Professions (125 citations), Pharmacy (16 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (74 citations) and Health (19 citations). Berit Bringedal has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benedicte Carlsen, Karin Isaksson Rø, Morten Magelssen, Kristine Bærøe, Eli Feiring, Fredrik Bååthe, Rei­dun Før­de, Judith Rosta, Bernd Carsten Stahl and Achim Rosemann. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMC Health Services Research, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health and Journal of Responsible Innovation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact