Andrew R. Casey
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Anna FrebelKevin C. SchlaufmanM. AsplundG. S. Da CostaDavid YongB. SchmidtK. LindM. S. Bessell
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (33 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew R. Casey
66 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.5k
- Instrumentation 672
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 167
- Computational Mechanics 64
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 44
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew R. Casey
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew R. Casey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew R. Casey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew R. Casey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew R. Casey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew R. Casey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew R. Casey. The network helps show where Andrew R. Casey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew R. Casey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew R. Casey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew R. Casey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew R. Casey. Andrew R. Casey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | Chemical Tagging can Work: Identificaton of Stellar Phase-Space Structures Purely by Chemical-Abudance Similarity | 51 |
| 19 | HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPIC STUDY OF EXTREMELY METAL-POOR STAR CANDIDATES FROM THE SKYMAPPER SURVEY | 81 |
| 20 | 60 |
About Andrew R. Casey
Andrew R. Casey is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (33 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (672 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (167 citations). Andrew R. Casey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anna Frebel, Kevin C. Schlaufman, M. Asplund, G. S. Da Costa, David Yong, B. Schmidt, K. Lind, M. S. Bessell, John E. Norris and Melissa Ness. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.