Andrew R. Casey

24.1k total citations
76 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Andrew R. Casey is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew R. Casey has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 68 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 33 papers in Instrumentation and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Andrew R. Casey's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (33 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (28 papers). Andrew R. Casey is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (65 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (33 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (28 papers). Andrew R. Casey collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Andrew R. Casey's co-authors include Anna Frebel, Kevin C. Schlaufman, M. Asplund, G. S. Da Costa, David Yong, B. Schmidt, K. Lind, M. S. Bessell, John E. Norris and Melissa Ness and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Andrew R. Casey

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Andrew R. Casey
Avi Shporer United States
M. E. Huber United States
Jason L. Sanders United Kingdom
Frank J. Masci United States
Ronald Wilhelm United States
Alexander P. Ji United States
M. Calkins United States
Melissa Ness United States
T. W. S. Holoien United States
Avi Shporer United States
Andrew R. Casey
Citations per year, relative to Andrew R. Casey Andrew R. Casey (= 1×) peers Avi Shporer

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew R. Casey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew R. Casey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew R. Casey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew R. Casey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew R. Casey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew R. Casey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew R. Casey. The network helps show where Andrew R. Casey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew R. Casey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew R. Casey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew R. Casey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew R. Casey. Andrew R. Casey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Saydjari, Andrew K., Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Jon A. Holtzman, et al.. (2025). Improving Radial Velocities by Marginalizing over Stars and Sky: Achieving 30 m s−1 RV Precision for APOGEE in the Plate Era. The Astronomical Journal. 169(3). 167–167.
2.
Ponte, M. Dal, A. Bragaglia, Andrew R. Casey, et al.. (2025). Stellar Population Astrophysics (SPA) with the TNG. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 701. A289–A289.
3.
Heikkinen, P. J., L. V. Levitin, Xavier Rojas, et al.. (2025). Chiral Superfluid Helium-3 in the Quasi-Two-Dimensional Limit. Physical Review Letters. 134(13). 136001–136001.
4.
Castro-Ginard, A., Zephyr Penoyre, Andrew R. Casey, et al.. (2024). Gaia DR3 detectability of unresolved binary systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 688. A1–A1. 25 indexed citations
5.
Ness, Melissa, Benjamin T. Montet, Matteo Cantiello, et al.. (2024). Many Roads Lead to Lithium: Formation Pathways For Lithium-rich Red Giants. The Astrophysical Journal. 964(1). 42–42. 11 indexed citations
6.
Rains, Adam D., Thomas Nordlander, Stephanie Monty, et al.. (2024). Cool and data-driven: an exploration of optical cool dwarf chemistry with both data-driven and physical models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529(4). 3171–3196. 5 indexed citations
7.
Jeffries, R. D., R. J. Jackson, N. J. Wright, et al.. (2023). The Gaia-ESO Survey: empirical estimates of stellar ages from lithium equivalent widths (eagles). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 523(1). 802–824. 38 indexed citations
8.
Yong, David, Chiaki Kobayashi, G. S. Da Costa, et al.. (2021). r-Process elements from magnetorotational hypernovae. Nature. 595(7866). 223–226. 41 indexed citations
9.
Casey, Andrew R., Alexander P. Ji, Terese T. Hansen, et al.. (2021). Signature of a Massive Rotating Metal-poor Star Imprinted in the Phoenix Stellar Stream*. The Astrophysical Journal. 921(1). 67–67. 4 indexed citations
10.
Spina, L., J. Meléndez, Megan Bedell, et al.. (2021). Chemical evidence for planetary ingestion in a quarter of Sun-like stars. Nature Astronomy. 5(11). 1163–1169. 40 indexed citations
11.
Karakas, Amanda I., Andrew R. Casey, R. G. Izzard, et al.. (2021). Population synthesis of accreting white dwarfs: rates and evolutionary pathways of H and He novae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 504(4). 6117–6143. 11 indexed citations
12.
Yong, David, G. S. Da Costa, M. S. Bessell, et al.. (2021). High-resolution spectroscopic follow-up of the most metal-poor candidates from SkyMapper DR1.1. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 507(3). 4102–4119. 16 indexed citations
13.
Eldridge, J. J., E. R. Stanway, Katelyn Breivik, et al.. (2020). Weighing in on black hole binaries with bpass: LB-1 does not contain a 70 M⊙ black hole. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 495(3). 2786–2795. 34 indexed citations
14.
Marino, A. F., G. S. Da Costa, Andrew R. Casey, et al.. (2019). Keck HIRES spectroscopy of SkyMapper commissioning survey candidate extremely metal-poor stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 485(4). 5153–5167. 13 indexed citations
15.
Casey, Andrew R., John C. Lattanzio, Aldeida Aleti, et al.. (2019). A Data-driven Model of Nucleosynthesis with Chemical Tagging in a Lower-dimensional Latent Space. The Astrophysical Journal. 887(1). 73–73. 9 indexed citations
16.
Costa, G. S. Da, M. S. Bessell, Dougal Mackey, et al.. (2019). The SkyMapper DR1.1 search for extremely metal-poor stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 489(4). 5900–5918. 43 indexed citations
17.
Nordlander, Thomas, M. S. Bessell, G. S. Da Costa, et al.. (2019). The lowest detected stellar Fe abundance: the halo star SMSS J160540.18−144323.1. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 488(1). L109–L113. 47 indexed citations
18.
Hogg, David W., Andrew R. Casey, Melissa Ness, et al.. (2016). Chemical Tagging can Work: Identificaton of Stellar Phase-Space Structures Purely by Chemical-Abudance Similarity. Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences). 51 indexed citations
19.
Keller, Stefan, Andrew R. Casey, M. Asplund, et al.. (2015). HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPIC STUDY OF EXTREMELY METAL-POOR STAR CANDIDATES FROM THE SKYMAPPER SURVEY. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 81 indexed citations
20.
Bessell, M. S., R. Collet, Stefan Keller, et al.. (2015). NUCLEOSYNTHESIS IN A PRIMORDIAL SUPERNOVA: CARBON AND OXYGEN ABUNDANCES IN SMSS J031300.36–670839.3. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 806(1). L16–L16. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026