Benjamin Lenk

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 875 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Lenk is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Lenk has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 875 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 2 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Lenk's work include Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (3 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers). Benjamin Lenk is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (3 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers). Benjamin Lenk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and United Kingdom. Benjamin Lenk's co-authors include Markus Münzenberg, Henning Ulrichs, Jaroslav Hamrle, Yuchen Zhang, François Méar, A. Lindsay Greer, Gerrit Eilers, Jaromı́r Pištora and B. Hillebrands and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review B and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Lenk

6 papers receiving 864 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The building blocks of magnonics

2011 697 citations Benjamin Lenk, Henning Ulrichs et al. Physics Reports profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Benjamin Lenk Germany	6	786	324	293	275	124	6	875
Minori Goto Japan	14	635 0.8×	282 0.9×	227 0.8×	245 0.9×	197 1.6×	59	754
Roman Antoš Czechia	14	392 0.5×	180 0.6×	379 1.3×	92 0.3×	128 1.0×	43	630
N. Ohta Japan	11	401 0.5×	196 0.6×	239 0.8×	135 0.5×	109 0.9×	62	529
Vincent Sokalski United States	14	351 0.4×	218 0.7×	129 0.4×	127 0.5×	144 1.2×	26	467
Hideki Hatano Japan	16	633 0.8×	73 0.2×	480 1.6×	124 0.5×	196 1.6×	54	791
Christian Eisenschmidt Germany	11	311 0.4×	142 0.4×	367 1.3×	66 0.2×	182 1.5×	12	541
R. Malmhäll United States	15	445 0.6×	372 1.1×	218 0.7×	200 0.7×	110 0.9×	52	697
Michael Kabatek United States	5	551 0.7×	224 0.7×	448 1.5×	93 0.3×	91 0.7×	5	614
А. V. Telegin Russia	15	279 0.4×	395 1.2×	295 1.0×	156 0.6×	242 2.0×	107	652

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Lenk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Lenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Lenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Lenk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Lenk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Lenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Lenk. The network helps show where Benjamin Lenk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Lenk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Lenk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Lenk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Lenk. Benjamin Lenk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Lenk, Benjamin, et al.. (2015). A scenario for magnonic spin-wave traps. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 12824–12824. 18 indexed citations

2.

Lenk, Benjamin, et al.. (2011). The building blocks of magnonics. Physics Reports. 507(4-5). 107–136. 697 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Lenk, Benjamin, Gerrit Eilers, Jaroslav Hamrle, & Markus Münzenberg. (2010). Spin-wave population in nickel after femtosecond laser pulse excitation. Physical Review B. 82(13). 30 indexed citations

4.

Ulrichs, Henning, Benjamin Lenk, & Markus Münzenberg. (2010). Magnonic spin-wave modes in CoFeB antidot lattices. Applied Physics Letters. 97(9). 73 indexed citations

5.

Hamrle, Jaroslav, Jaromı́r Pištora, B. Hillebrands, Benjamin Lenk, & Markus Münzenberg. (2010). Analytical expression of the magneto-optical Kerr effect and Brillouin light scattering intensity arising from dynamic magnetization. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics. 43(32). 325004–325004. 19 indexed citations

6.

Méar, François, Benjamin Lenk, Yuchen Zhang, & A. Lindsay Greer. (2008). Structural relaxation in a heavily cold-worked metallic glass. Scripta Materialia. 59(12). 1243–1246. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact