Benjamin James Bush
Impact in
-
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Papers in
-
- Data Visualization and Analytics 2
-
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence 2
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques 1
- Co-authors
- Hiroki Sayama (4 shared papers)Shelley D. Dionne (2 shared papers)Chanyu Hao (2 shared papers)Thilo Groß (1 shared paper)Jeffrey Schmidt (1 shared paper)Andra Serban (1 shared paper)Alka Gupta (1 shared paper)Francis J. Yammarino (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Computers & Mathematics with Applications (1 paper)The Leadership Quarterly (1 paper)Organizational Research Methods (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanCanada
In The Last Decade
Benjamin James Bush
4 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 68
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 44
- Communication 24
- Social Psychology 56
- Management of Technology and Innovation 17
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin James Bush
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin James Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin James Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin James Bush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin James Bush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin James Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin James Bush. The network helps show where Benjamin James Bush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin James Bush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
About Benjamin James Bush
Benjamin James Bush is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Communication, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 4 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper), Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (68 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (44 citations), Communication (24 citations), Social Psychology (56 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (17 citations). Benjamin James Bush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hiroki Sayama, Shelley D. Dionne, Chanyu Hao, Thilo Groß, Jeffrey Schmidt, Andra Serban, Alka Gupta and Francis J. Yammarino. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Mathematics with Applications, The Leadership Quarterly, Organizational Research Methods and IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.