N. Smith

427 citations
16 papers · 281 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

N. Smith

16 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

N. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Insect Science 61
  • Animal Science and Zoology 41
  • Small Animals 18
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 57
  • Parasitology 14
Replace A Moral with:
A Moral Spain
Monika Vícenová Czechia
E. Flores Spain
D. C. Cann United Kingdom
Kun Pang China
Shabiha Sultana South Korea
Bruno Urbain Belgium
David McDonagh Ireland
Simone Maria Massami Kitamura Martins Brazil
D. D. Burnett United States
N. Smith relative to A Moral Spain A Moral's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
A Moral · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Smith. The network helps show where N. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Smith Line = papers co-authored together N. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201055
2 201550
3 198245
4 202432
5 197332
6 202416
7 197815
8 20008
9 19797
10 19786
11 20146
12 19794
13 19772
14
Field studies with selected skin repellents against natural infestations of Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann).
19761
15 20161
16
The nutritional content of South African cheeses.
19981

About N. Smith

N. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science and Molecular Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (2 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (1 paper), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (1 paper) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (61 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (41 citations), Small Animals (18 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (57 citations) and Parasitology (14 citations). N. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David A. Carlson, C. E. Schreck, David Godwin, Lu‐Kwang Ju, Cletus P. Kurtzman, Tsung Min Kuo, Nathan C. Nelson, D. G. Haile, H. K. Gouck and Michael Orth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Entomology, Journal of Economic Entomology, Water Science & Technology, Poultry Science and Microbiology Spectrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact