Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier
- Insect Science top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Pharmacology
- Food Science
- Biomaterials
- Co-authors
- Gary L. BowlinMarko RadicRichard A. SmithScott A. SellMyriam LabelleBlythe E. JanowiakFabio DemontisFlávia A. Graça
- Topics
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis (6 papers)Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers)Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (4 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCancer Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSpain
In The Last Decade
Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier
15 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Insect Science 166
- Rehabilitation 78
- Pharmacology 67
- Food Science 61
- Biomaterials 51
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier. The network helps show where Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier. Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 125 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 26 |
About Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier
Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Insect Science and Biomaterials, having authored 15 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bee Products Chemical Analysis (6 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (166 citations), Rehabilitation (78 citations) and Pharmacology (67 citations). Benjamin A. Minden‐Birkenmaier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gary L. Bowlin, Marko Radic, Richard A. Smith, Scott A. Sell, Myriam Labelle, Blythe E. Janowiak, Fabio Demontis, Flávia A. Graça, Abbas Shirinifard and Yong‐Dong Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.