Benedikt Wirth

1.7k citations
53 papers · 967 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Benedikt Wirth

47 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

Benedikt Wirth
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 74
  • Numerical Analysis 102
  • Computational Mechanics 320
  • Computational Mathematics 8
  • Immunology and Allergy 69
Replace Rolf Krause with:
Rolf Krause Switzerland
David Kay United Kingdom
Bruce H. Smaill New Zealand
Mark A. Peletier Netherlands
Christian Engwer Germany
Johan Hake Norway
Damiano Lombardi France
Miguel O. Bernabéu United Kingdom
Fernando Mut United States
Aymeric Perchant France
Benedikt Wirth relative to Rolf Krause Switzerland Rolf Krause's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Rolf Krause · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benedikt Wirth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benedikt Wirth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benedikt Wirth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benedikt Wirth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benedikt Wirth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benedikt Wirth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benedikt Wirth. The network helps show where Benedikt Wirth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benedikt Wirth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benedikt Wirth Line = papers co-authored together Benedikt Wirth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20240
5 20231
6 20220
7 202027
8 20203
9 20192
10 201931
11 2017118
12 20167
13 201666
14 20141
15 20138
16 20104
17 200818
18 200642
19 200636
20
[On the mechanism of dextran action in rats].
19661

About Benedikt Wirth

Benedikt Wirth is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Structural Biology, Computational Mechanics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (9 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (8 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (7 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (4 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (74 citations), Numerical Analysis (102 citations), Computational Mechanics (320 citations), Computational Mathematics (8 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (69 citations). Benedikt Wirth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Ring, Martin Rumpf, Ian J. Sobey, Max Wardetzky, Jian Song, Xueli Zhang, Lydia Sorokin, Konrad Buscher, Thomas Pock and Kristian Bredies. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Medicine and Biology A Journal of the IMA, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Computer Graphics Forum and Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026