Ben Freyens

44 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Ben Freyens
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Public Administration 36
  • Media Technology 54
  • Strategy and Management 57
  • Economics and Econometrics 76
  • Management Science and Operations Research 31
Replace Ani Matei with:
Ani Matei Romania
David Špaček Czechia
Lewis Evans New Zealand
Silvia Iacuzzi Italy
Vincent Mabillard Switzerland
Dónal Palcic Ireland
Alessandro Natalini Italy
Ali Pirannejad Iran
David Sweeting United Kingdom
Dominique E. Uwizeyimana South Africa
Ben Freyens relative to Ani Matei Romania Ani Matei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Ani Matei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Freyens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Freyens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Freyens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Freyens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Freyens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Freyens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Freyens. The network helps show where Ben Freyens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Ben Freyens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Freyens Line = papers co-authored together Ben Freyens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Policy in Action: The Challenge of Service Delivery
200934
2 201729
3 200928
4 201225
5 201613
6 201011
7 200711
8 201110
9 201110
10 201110
11 20099
12 20167
13
A first look at incidence and outcomes of unfair dismissal claims under Fair Work, Work Choices and the Workplace Relations Act
20136
14 20116
15 20076
16 20066
17 20106
18 20146
19 20176
20 20165

About Ben Freyens

Ben Freyens is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Media Technology, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 47 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (12 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (9 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (7 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers) and Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (36 citations), Media Technology (54 citations), Strategy and Management (57 citations), Economics and Econometrics (76 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (31 citations). Ben Freyens has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include John Butcher, John Wanna, Robert Ackland, Steve Dowrick, Hitomi Nakanishi, Deborah Blackman, Xiaodong Gong, Oleg Yerokhin, Huong Dinh and Angela M. Benson. Their work appears in journals such as Telecommunications Policy, Information Economics and Policy, Journal of Public Economic Theory, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction and International Labour Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact