Journal of Public Economic Theory

1.1k papers and 11.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Journal of Public Economic Theory in the last decades have received a total of 11.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Public Economic Theory usually cover Economics and Econometrics (916 papers), Safety Research (219 papers) and Accounting (214 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (455 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (217 papers) and Economic theories and models (198 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Public Economic Theory are Martin L. Weitzman, James Andreoni, Lorenzo Burlón, Thomas J. Nechyba, Koleman Strumpf, David Martimort, Elisabetta Iossa, Mari Rege, Szilvia Pápai and Larry Samuelson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Public Economic Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Public Economic Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Public Economic Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Public Economic Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Public Economic Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Public Economic Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Public Economic Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025