Beate Dunst

1.3k total citations
9 papers, 766 citations indexed

About

Beate Dunst is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Beate Dunst has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 766 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Beate Dunst's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). Beate Dunst is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). Beate Dunst collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Beate Dunst's co-authors include Mathias Benedek, Aljoscha C. Neubauer, Emanuel Jauk, Karl Koschutnig, Andréas Fink, Roger E. Beaty, Paul J. Silvia, Sabine Bergner, Markus Sommer and Anja Ischebeck and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Personality and Individual Differences and Brain and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Beate Dunst

8 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beate Dunst Austria 7 504 454 121 80 75 9 766
Belén Guerra-Carrillo United States 5 153 0.3× 394 0.9× 83 0.7× 57 0.7× 75 1.0× 5 732
Joshua D. Cosman United States 19 269 0.5× 611 1.3× 150 1.2× 139 1.7× 15 0.2× 41 1.0k
Krystyna Rymarczyk Poland 15 218 0.4× 436 1.0× 205 1.7× 59 0.7× 23 0.3× 31 687
Yuhang Long China 14 122 0.2× 413 0.9× 202 1.7× 53 0.7× 38 0.5× 31 605
Joseph Schmidt United States 15 176 0.3× 486 1.1× 48 0.4× 50 0.6× 39 0.5× 34 657
Pauline L. Baniqued United States 12 236 0.5× 288 0.6× 29 0.2× 128 1.6× 46 0.6× 16 594
Julia Föcker Germany 13 344 0.7× 456 1.0× 99 0.8× 119 1.5× 9 0.1× 33 689
Kaoru Horie Japan 17 254 0.5× 801 1.8× 279 2.3× 334 4.2× 42 0.6× 43 1.0k
David E. Fencsik United States 9 181 0.4× 942 2.1× 250 2.1× 84 1.1× 17 0.2× 16 1.1k
Prisca Stenneken Germany 20 211 0.4× 666 1.5× 229 1.9× 458 5.7× 29 0.4× 59 949

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Dunst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Dunst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Dunst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Dunst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Dunst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Dunst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Dunst. The network helps show where Beate Dunst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beate Dunst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beate Dunst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beate Dunst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beate Dunst. Beate Dunst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Jauk, Emanuel, Beate Dunst, Mathias Benedek, & Aljoscha C. Neubauer. (2018). Intelligence and double-bounded creativity scores from study on threshold hypothesis via segmented regression. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
2.
Jauk, Emanuel, Aljoscha C. Neubauer, Beate Dunst, Andréas Fink, & Mathias Benedek. (2015). Gray matter correlates of creative potential: A latent variable voxel-based morphometry study. NeuroImage. 111. 312–320. 81 indexed citations
3.
Dunst, Beate, Mathias Benedek, Karl Koschutnig, Emanuel Jauk, & Aljoscha C. Neubauer. (2014). Sex differences in the IQ-white matter microstructure relationship: A DTI study. Brain and Cognition. 91. 71–78. 49 indexed citations
4.
Benedek, Mathias, Roger E. Beaty, Emanuel Jauk, et al.. (2014). Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production. NeuroImage. 90. 99–106. 165 indexed citations
5.
Neubauer, Aljoscha C., Emanuel Jauk, Mathias Benedek, & Beate Dunst. (2014). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Personality and Individual Differences. 60. S44–S44. 14 indexed citations
6.
Dunst, Beate, Mathias Benedek, Emanuel Jauk, & Aljoscha C. Neubauer. (2014). Neural efficiency depending on subjective and objective level of task difficulty – An fMRI study. Personality and Individual Differences. 60. S36–S37. 2 indexed citations
7.
Jauk, Emanuel, Mathias Benedek, Beate Dunst, & Aljoscha C. Neubauer. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence. 41(4). 212–221. 282 indexed citations
8.
Dunst, Beate, Mathias Benedek, Emanuel Jauk, et al.. (2013). Neural efficiency as a function of task demands. Intelligence. 42(100). 22–30. 152 indexed citations
9.
Dunst, Beate, Mathias Benedek, Sabine Bergner, Ursula Athenstaedt, & Aljoscha C. Neubauer. (2013). Sex differences in neural efficiency: Are they due to the stereotype threat effect?. Personality and Individual Differences. 55(7). 744–749. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026