Heinrich Rickert
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- History and Philosophy of Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Craig CalhounGuy OakesMartín HeideggerPaul Gerhard NatorpWilhelm WindelbandHermann CohenErnst Cassirer
- Topics
- Historical Studies in Science (2 papers)Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsTijdschrift voor PhilosophieLes études philosophiques
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandBelgium
In The Last Decade
Heinrich Rickert
10 papers receiving 64 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Sociology and Political Science 30
- Philosophy 25
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 15
- History and Philosophy of Science 13
- Political Science and International Relations 10
Countries citing papers authored by Heinrich Rickert
This map shows the geographic impact of Heinrich Rickert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heinrich Rickert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heinrich Rickert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heinrich Rickert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heinrich Rickert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heinrich Rickert. The network helps show where Heinrich Rickert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heinrich Rickert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heinrich Rickert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heinrich Rickert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heinrich Rickert. Heinrich Rickert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Die Philosophie Des Lebens | 4 |
| 8 | Lettres 1912-1933 et autres documents | 0 |
| 9 | Die Philosophie des Lebens : Darstellung und Kritik der philosophischen Modeströmungen unserer Zeit | 8 |
| 10 | Néokantismes et théorie de la connaissance | 0 |
| 11 | Briefe 1912 bis 1933 und andere Dokumente | 5 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Science and history : a critique of positivist epistemology | 26 |
| 16 | Science and History | 3 |
About Heinrich Rickert
Heinrich Rickert is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 16 papers that have together received 90 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Science (2 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations), Philosophy (25 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). Heinrich Rickert has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Craig Calhoun, Guy Oakes, Martín Heidegger, Paul Gerhard Natorp, Wilhelm Windelband, Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Tijdschrift voor Philosophie and Les études philosophiques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.