Barbara Scala

42 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Barbara Scala
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Space and Planetary Science 36
  • Geology 88
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 160
  • Conservation 35
  • Management Information Systems 53
Replace J. Spijker with:
J. Spijker Netherlands
Liliana Beltrán United States
Hassan Bazazzadeh Iran
Virpi Leivo Finland
Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj Iran
Hyoungsub Kim United States
Evanthia Giagloglou Serbia
Tiziano Dalla Mora Italy
Ernesto Antonini Italy
Barbara Scala relative to J. Spijker Netherlands J. Spijker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
J. Spijker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Scala

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Scala's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Scala with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Scala more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Scala

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Scala. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Scala. The network helps show where Barbara Scala may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Scala, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Scala Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Scala links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021100
2 201250
3 201739
4 201531
5 201526
6 201220
7 201420
8 201415
9 201313
10 201213
11 202213
12
HBIM for planned conservation: a new approach to information management
201912
13 201912
14 20179
15
Cadmium blood/urine levels and blood pressure in workers occupationally exposed to urban stressor.
20129
16 20137
17 20136
18 20146
19 20135
20
[Phlebopathies and occupation].
20125

About Barbara Scala

Barbara Scala is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Geology, Conservation, Speech and Hearing and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 47 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (12 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (11 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (5 papers), Urban Planning and Valuation (5 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (4 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (36 citations), Geology (88 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (160 citations), Conservation (35 citations) and Management Information Systems (53 citations). Barbara Scala has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Argentina and France. Frequent co-authors include Claire Lindsay, Andrea Adami, Francesco Tomei, A. Sancini, Tiziana Caciari, Maria Valeria Rosati, Gianfranco Tomei, Manuela Ciarrocca, G Tomei and Maria Pia Schifano. Their work appears in journals such as Information and Software Technology, Toxicology and Industrial Health, Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology and Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact