Michael S. Pulia

76 papers receiving 868 citations

Peers

Michael S. Pulia
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 158
  • Health Informatics 44
  • Health Information Management 110
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 21
  • Family Practice 34
Replace Amartya Mukhopadhyay with:
Amartya Mukhopadhyay Singapore
Peter S. Dayan United States
Ashley Snyder United States
Berna DL Broekhuizen Netherlands
Angela M. Statile United States
Richelle J. Cooper United States
Lauren Lapointe‐Shaw Canada
Donald H. Arnold United States
Julia E. Szymczak United States
Noel Eldridge United States
Michael S. Pulia relative to Amartya Mukhopadhyay Singapore Amartya Mukhopadhyay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Amartya Mukhopadhyay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Pulia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Pulia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Pulia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Pulia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Pulia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Pulia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Pulia. The network helps show where Michael S. Pulia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Pulia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael S. Pulia Line = papers co-authored together Michael S. Pulia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20241
5 202420
6 20243
7 20231
8 20233
9 202311
10 20224
11 20226
12 20228
13 202213
14 201929
15 201912
16 201858
17 201835
18 201714
19 201411
20
Public Opinion on Environmental Issues: Does It Influence Government Action?
20083

About Michael S. Pulia

Michael S. Pulia is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Health Information Management, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Emergency Medicine and Family Practice, having authored 84 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (23 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (17 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (13 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (10 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (9 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (9 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (158 citations), Health Informatics (44 citations), Health Information Management (110 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (21 citations) and Family Practice (34 citations). Michael S. Pulia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Brian W. Patterson, Pascale Carayon, Peter Hoonakker, Douglas A. Wiegmann, Larissa May, Rebecca J. Schwei, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Nasia Safdar, Manish N. Shah and Megan E. Salwei. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Academic Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026