Ayn Shlisky
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology
- Insect Science top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- John J. BattlesBarbara Allen‐DiazRobert C. HealdReginald H. BarrettRyan D. HaugoMark A. SternJane KertisRandy Swaty
- Topics
- Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ayn Shlisky
9 papers receiving 272 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 202
- Global and Planetary Change 191
- Ecology 98
- Insect Science 79
- Plant Science 48
Countries citing papers authored by Ayn Shlisky
This map shows the geographic impact of Ayn Shlisky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ayn Shlisky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ayn Shlisky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ayn Shlisky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ayn Shlisky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ayn Shlisky. The network helps show where Ayn Shlisky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ayn Shlisky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ayn Shlisky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ayn Shlisky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ayn Shlisky. Ayn Shlisky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | |
| 2 | Modeling on the grand scale: LANDFIRE lessons learned | 4 |
| 3 | Use of state-and-transition simulation modeling in National Forest planning in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A | 2 |
| 4 | Fire, ecosystems & people: threats and strategies for global biodiversity conservation | 8 |
| 5 | Net Primary Production and Biomass Distribution in the Blue Oak Savanna 1 | 5 |
| 6 | Good fire, bad fire: how to think about forest land management and ecological processes. | 2 |
| 7 | Dynamic Vegetation Modeling: Driving Management Changes Today by Looking into the Past and Future | 2 |
| 8 | 203 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 |
About Ayn Shlisky
Ayn Shlisky is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (202 citations), Global and Planetary Change (191 citations) and Insect Science (79 citations). Ayn Shlisky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John J. Battles, Barbara Allen‐Diaz, Robert C. Heald, Reginald H. Barrett, Ryan D. Haugo, Mark A. Stern, Jane Kertis, Randy Swaty, Jim Smith and James W. Bartolome. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Forestry and Rangelands.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.