Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking
2003564 citationsSotaro Kita, Aslı ÖzyürekJournal of Memory and Languageprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Aslı Özyürek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aslı Özyürek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aslı Özyürek more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aslı Özyürek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aslı Özyürek. The network helps show where Aslı Özyürek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aslı Özyürek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aslı Özyürek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aslı Özyürek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Aslı Özyürek. Aslı Özyürek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ortega, Gerardo, et al.. (2017). Speakers’ gestures predict the meaning and perception of iconicity in signs. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 889–894.10 indexed citations
9.
Özyürek, Aslı & Gerardo Ortega. (2016). Language in the visual modality: Co-speech Gesture and Sign. Max Planck Digital Library. 67–83.
10.
Ortega, Gerardo, et al.. (2014). Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 1114–1119.16 indexed citations
Peeters, David, et al.. (2014). The interplay between joint attention, physical proximity, and pointing gesture in demonstrative choice. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 1144–1149.12 indexed citations
Holler, Judith, et al.. (2013). Here's not looking at you, kid! Unaddressed recipients benefit from co-speech gestures when speech processing suffers. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 2560–2565.1 indexed citations
15.
Holler, Judith, Spencer D. Kelly, Peter Hagoort, & Aslı Özyürek. (2012). When gestures catch the eye: The influence of gaze direction on co-speech gesture comprehension in triadic communication. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 34(34). 467–472.9 indexed citations
Willems, Roel M., Aslı Özyürek, & Peter Hagoort. (2005). The comprehension of gesture and speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 17. 231.2 indexed citations
20.
Kita, Sotaro & Aslı Özyürek. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language. 48(1). 16–32.564 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.