Arik Ragowsky

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
27 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Arik Ragowsky is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Arik Ragowsky has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Management Information Systems, 9 papers in Information Systems and Management and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Arik Ragowsky's work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (17 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (9 papers) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (8 papers). Arik Ragowsky is often cited by papers focused on Information Technology Governance and Strategy (17 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (9 papers) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (8 papers). Arik Ragowsky collaborates with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Israel. Arik Ragowsky's co-authors include Neveen Awad, David Gefen, Toni M. Somers, Dennis A. Adams, Paul S. Licker, Seev Neumann, Niv Ahituv, Klara Nelson, Catherine M. Ridings and Matti Rossi and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, Information & Management and Journal of Management Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Arik Ragowsky

26 papers receiving 883 citations

Hit Papers

Establishing Trust in Electronic Commerce Through Online ... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Arik Ragowsky United States 13 466 448 389 182 177 27 1.0k
John Benamati United States 16 455 1.0× 359 0.8× 246 0.6× 228 1.3× 110 0.6× 42 916
En Mao United States 14 779 1.7× 799 1.8× 230 0.6× 228 1.3× 337 1.9× 32 1.4k
Yi‐Wen Fan Taiwan 11 392 0.8× 414 0.9× 129 0.3× 171 0.9× 222 1.3× 30 873
Samar Mouakket United Arab Emirates 17 551 1.2× 462 1.0× 166 0.4× 162 0.9× 159 0.9× 42 939
Douglas E. Turner United States 9 314 0.7× 221 0.5× 308 0.8× 149 0.8× 98 0.6× 12 860
Greta L. Polites United States 13 356 0.8× 368 0.8× 120 0.3× 173 1.0× 147 0.8× 22 848
Theerasak Thanasankit Australia 9 557 1.2× 502 1.1× 216 0.6× 294 1.6× 261 1.5× 16 1.0k
Youlong Zhuang United States 8 917 2.0× 648 1.4× 146 0.4× 282 1.5× 214 1.2× 13 1.3k
Deb Sledgianowski United States 7 399 0.9× 458 1.0× 251 0.6× 76 0.4× 64 0.4× 13 828
Erling C. Havn Denmark 12 356 0.8× 382 0.9× 119 0.3× 139 0.8× 63 0.4× 30 760

Countries citing papers authored by Arik Ragowsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arik Ragowsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arik Ragowsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arik Ragowsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arik Ragowsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arik Ragowsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arik Ragowsky. The network helps show where Arik Ragowsky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arik Ragowsky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arik Ragowsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arik Ragowsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arik Ragowsky. Arik Ragowsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gefen, David, et al.. (2025). The Importance of Distrust in Trusting Digital Worker Chatbots. Communications of the ACM. 68(4). 42–49. 1 indexed citations
2.
Heart, Tsipi, et al.. (2021). About the ISM Special Issue: The Business Value of Data Analytics. Information Systems Management. 38(3). 183–184. 3 indexed citations
3.
Ragowsky, Arik, Paul S. Licker, & David Gefen. (2014). Organizational Information Technology Maturity. 86–86. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ragowsky, Arik, Paul S. Licker, & David Gefen. (2012). Organizational IT Maturity (OITM): A Measure of Organizational Readiness and Effectiveness to Obtain Value from Its Information Technology. Information Systems Management. 29(2). 148–160. 24 indexed citations
5.
Gefen, David, et al.. (2011). The Changing Role of the CIO in the World of Outsourcing: Lessons Learned from a CIO Roundtable. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 28. 15 indexed citations
6.
Awad, Neveen & Arik Ragowsky. (2008). Establishing Trust in Electronic Commerce Through Online Word of Mouth: An Examination Across Genders. Journal of Management Information Systems. 24(4). 101–121. 489 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Gefen, David, Arik Ragowsky, & Catherine M. Ridings. (2008). Leadership and justice: Increasing non participating users’ assessment of an IT through passive participation. Information & Management. 45(8). 507–512. 22 indexed citations
8.
Ragowsky, Arik, Paul S. Licker, & David Gefen. (2008). Give me information, not technology. Communications of the ACM. 51(6). 23–25. 8 indexed citations
9.
Ragowsky, Arik & David Gefen. (2008). What makes the competitive contribution of ERP strategic. ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 39(2). 33–49. 28 indexed citations
10.
Ragowsky, Arik, Toni M. Somers, & Dennis A. Adams. (2005). Assessing the Value Provided by ERP Applications Through Organizational Activities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 16. 26 indexed citations
11.
Gefen, David & Arik Ragowsky. (2005). A Multi-Level Approach to Measuring the Benefits of an Erp System in Manufacturing Firms. Information Systems Management. 22(1). 18–25. 79 indexed citations
12.
Ragowsky, Arik & Toni M. Somers. (2002). Special Section: Enterprise Resource Planning.. Journal of Management Information Systems. 19. 11–16. 36 indexed citations
13.
Ragowsky, Arik, et al.. (2002). ERP SYSTEMS SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION:A CROSS-CULTURAL APPROACH. 11 indexed citations
14.
Mason, Charles F. & Arik Ragowsky. (2002). On the value of information from using information systems. 3. 278–287. 1 indexed citations
15.
Mason, Charles F. & Arik Ragowsky. (2002). How Supplier Characteristics Influence the Value of a Supplier Management ERP Application. Information Technology and Management. 3(1-2). 161–180. 3 indexed citations
16.
Romm, Celia T. & Arik Ragowsky. (2001). Searching for a "Killer Application" for On-Line Teaching-Or Are We?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3 indexed citations
17.
Somers, Toni M., Klara Nelson, & Arik Ragowsky. (2000). Enterprise Resource Plannin (ERP) for the Next Millenium: Development of an Integrative Framework and Implications for Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 47 indexed citations
18.
Ragowsky, Arik, Niv Ahituv, & Seev Neumann. (2000). The benefits of using information systems. Communications of the ACM. 43(11es). 13–13. 11 indexed citations
19.
Ragowsky, Arik, et al.. (1997). The benefits of IS for CIM applications: A survey. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 10(1-4). 245–255. 3 indexed citations
20.
Ragowsky, Arik, Niv Ahituv, & Seev Neumann. (1996). Identifying the value and importance of an information system application. Information & Management. 31(2). 89–102. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026