Countries citing papers authored by Ard‐Pieter de Man
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ard‐Pieter de Man's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ard‐Pieter de Man with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ard‐Pieter de Man more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ard‐Pieter de Man
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ard‐Pieter de Man. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ard‐Pieter de Man. The network helps show where Ard‐Pieter de Man may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ard‐Pieter de Man
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ard‐Pieter de Man.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ard‐Pieter de Man based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ard‐Pieter de Man. Ard‐Pieter de Man is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Castaldi, Carolina, et al.. (2019). A taxonomy of firm-level IPR application practices to inform policy debates. Econstor (Econstor).2 indexed citations
Nemet, Andreja, et al.. (2011). Agri-environmental payment issues in Romanian agriculture.. Scientific Papers Series - Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 11(1). 153–154.1 indexed citations
Flikkema, Meindert, et al.. (2010). New trademark registration as an indicator of innovation: results of an explorative study of Benelux trademark data. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).18 indexed citations
10.
Dittrich, Koen, Geert Duysters, & Ard‐Pieter de Man. (2007). Strategic Repositioning by means of alliances: The Case of IBM. Research Policy. 36(10).1 indexed citations
11.
Man, Ard‐Pieter de. (2005). Alliance Capability:. European Management Journal. 23(3). 315–323.30 indexed citations
12.
Dittrich, Koen, Geert Duysters, & Ard‐Pieter de Man. (2004). Using Networks For Changing Innovation Strategy: The Case Of IBM. ERIM report series research in management.6 indexed citations
Man, Ard‐Pieter de, et al.. (2003). De positie van Nederlandse bedrijven in innovatienetwerken.1 indexed citations
15.
Man, Ard‐Pieter de, et al.. (2002). e-Partnering:. European Management Journal. 20(4). 329–339.5 indexed citations
16.
Man, Ard‐Pieter de & C Esveld. (2001). REQUIREMENTS FOR RAIL FASTENINGS ON SLAB TRACK. 30(2). 9–12.1 indexed citations
17.
Man, Ard‐Pieter de, et al.. (2000). THE HIGH SPEED DEFLECTOGRAPH AND THE HAMMER EXCITATION TEST: TWO MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES FOR DETERMINING TRACK PERFORMANCE. 29(1).3 indexed citations
18.
Man, Ard‐Pieter de. (2000). Pin-pin resonance as a reference in determining ballasted railway track vibration behaviour. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).17 indexed citations
19.
Markine, V.L., Ard‐Pieter de Man, & C Esveld. (2000). Optimization of an embedded rail structure using a numerical technique. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 45(1).7 indexed citations
20.
Man, Ard‐Pieter de & Frans van den Bosch. (1997). Perspectives on Strategy-Contributions of Michael E. Porter. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.