Countries citing papers authored by Anupam Chander
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anupam Chander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anupam Chander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anupam Chander more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anupam Chander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anupam Chander. The network helps show where Anupam Chander may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anupam Chander
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anupam Chander.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anupam Chander based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anupam Chander. Anupam Chander is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Elsig, Manfred, Martina Francesca Ferracane, Andrew D. Mitchell, et al.. (2021). Big Data and Global Trade Law. Cambridge University Press eBooks.10 indexed citations
3.
Chander, Anupam & Madhavi Sunder. (2019). Dancing on the Grave of Copyright. eYLS (Yale Law School). 18(1). 143–161.1 indexed citations
4.
Chander, Anupam. (2018). CHALLENGES OF GREEN ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN INDIA – AN OVERVIEW. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 5(5). 574-577–574-577.1 indexed citations
5.
Chander, Anupam & Madhavi Sunder. (2018). The Battle to Define Asia's Intellectual Property Law: From TPP to RCEP. eYLS (Yale Law School). 8(3). 331.2 indexed citations
6.
Chander, Anupam. (2016). National Data Governance in a Global Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
7.
Chander, Anupam, et al.. (2015). Information Goes Global: Protecting Privacy, Security, and the New Economy in a World of Cross-Border Data Flows. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
8.
Biagioli, Mario, Anupam Chander, & Madhavi Sunder. (2013). Brand New World: Distinguishing Oneself in the Global Flow. SSRN Electronic Journal.
9.
Chander, Anupam & Madhavi Sunder. (2013). Copyright's Cultural Turn. Texas law review. 91(6). 1397.1 indexed citations
10.
Chander, Anupam. (2013). How Law Made Silicon Valley. Emory law journal. 63(3). 639.13 indexed citations
Chander, Anupam, et al.. (2010). Clearing Credit Default Swaps: A Case Study in Global Legal Convergence. Chicago journal of international law. 10(2). 10.5 indexed citations
Chander, Anupam. (2009). Trade 2.0. The Yale journal of international law. 34(2). 2.2 indexed citations
16.
Chander, Anupam. (2007). Flying the Mexican Flag in Los Angeles. Fordham law review. 75(5). 2455.2 indexed citations
17.
Chander, Anupam & Madhavi Sunder. (2007). Is Nozick Kicking Rawls's Ass? Intellectual Property and Social Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
18.
Chander, Anupam. (2006). Exporting DMCA Lockouts. Cleveland State law review. 54(1). 205.2 indexed citations
19.
Chander, Anupam. (2003). The New, New Property. Texas law review. 81(3). 715.5 indexed citations
20.
Chander, Anupam. (2002). Whose Republic? Republic.com Cass Sunstein. The University of Chicago Law Review. 69(3). 1479–1500.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.