Anuja Sathe

2.3k citations
34 papers · 1.6k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Anuja Sathe

32 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Anuja Sathe
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Molecular Biology 492
  • Cancer Research 96
  • Oncology 153
  • Immunology 108
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
Replace Wei Jin with:
Wei Jin China
Hiroyoshi Hiratsuka Japan
Ren Zhao China
Martine H. van Miltenburg Netherlands
Aida S. Hansen Denmark
Paula Keskula United States
Wenlin Du Japan
Hiroki Hashida Japan
Mamunur Rashid United Kingdom
Annelie E. Abrahamsson Sweden
Anuja Sathe relative to Wei Jin China Wei Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Wei Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anuja Sathe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anuja Sathe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anuja Sathe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anuja Sathe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anuja Sathe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anuja Sathe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anuja Sathe. The network helps show where Anuja Sathe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anuja Sathe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anuja Sathe Line = papers co-authored together Anuja Sathe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019305
2 2020282
3 2021156
4 2022142
5 2017137
6 202171
7 202063
8 202147
9 201846
10 201543
11 202434
12 201730
13 201428
14 201928
15 201722
16 202322
17 201721
18 202320
19 201718
20 202514

About Anuja Sathe

Anuja Sathe is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (4 papers), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers) and Immune cells in cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (492 citations), Cancer Research (96 citations), Oncology (153 citations), Immunology (108 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations). Anuja Sathe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hanlee P. Ji, Roman Nawroth, Susan M. Grimes, Quan Hoang Nguyen, Billy T. Lau, José Alquicira-Hernández, Joseph E. Powell, Carlos J. Suarez, George A. Poultsides and Jiamin Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Clinical Cancer Research, Genome biology, Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations and NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact