Antonia Misch

493 total citations
10 papers, 242 citations indexed

About

Antonia Misch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Antonia Misch has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 242 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Antonia Misch's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers). Antonia Misch is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers). Antonia Misch collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Antonia Misch's co-authors include Malinda Carpenter, Harriet Over, Yarrow Dunham, Markus Paulus, Fan Yang, María Victoria Hernández‐Lloreda, Michael Tomasello, Xin Yang, Esther Herrmann and Susanne Kristen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Antonia Misch

10 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Antonia Misch Germany 9 135 116 101 91 33 10 242
Evan Westra United States 11 90 0.7× 112 1.0× 128 1.3× 131 1.4× 44 1.3× 20 305
Erick Ross United States 2 156 1.2× 156 1.3× 143 1.4× 103 1.1× 46 1.4× 7 325
Stephanie M. Anglin United States 8 99 0.7× 61 0.5× 80 0.8× 82 0.9× 56 1.7× 18 257
Christina M. Tworek United States 2 159 1.2× 120 1.0× 133 1.3× 69 0.8× 50 1.5× 2 302
Marie Schäfer Germany 5 86 0.6× 125 1.1× 156 1.5× 57 0.6× 41 1.2× 10 273
Karoline Lohse Germany 5 105 0.8× 121 1.0× 164 1.6× 95 1.0× 45 1.4× 6 264
Trisha L. Weeks United States 5 99 0.7× 83 0.7× 126 1.2× 47 0.5× 28 0.8× 6 235
Shelby Cooley United States 9 276 2.0× 175 1.5× 226 2.2× 191 2.1× 35 1.1× 11 462
Emily Foster‐Hanson United States 9 98 0.7× 90 0.8× 106 1.0× 38 0.4× 35 1.1× 17 239
Elizabeth Brey United States 7 185 1.4× 152 1.3× 116 1.1× 51 0.6× 38 1.2× 10 316

Countries citing papers authored by Antonia Misch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antonia Misch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonia Misch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonia Misch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antonia Misch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonia Misch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonia Misch. The network helps show where Antonia Misch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antonia Misch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antonia Misch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antonia Misch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antonia Misch. Antonia Misch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Misch, Antonia, Markus Paulus, & Yarrow Dunham. (2021). Anticipation of future cooperation eliminates minimal ingroup bias in children and adults.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(10). 2036–2056. 24 indexed citations
3.
Misch, Antonia, Susanne Kristen, & Markus Paulus. (2021). A question of morals? The role of moral identity in support of the youth climate movement Fridays4Future. PLoS ONE. 16(3). e0248353–e0248353. 12 indexed citations
4.
Misch, Antonia & Yarrow Dunham. (2020). (Peer) Group influence on children’s prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 201. 104994–104994. 13 indexed citations
5.
Misch, Antonia, Harriet Over, & Malinda Carpenter. (2018). The Whistleblower's Dilemma in Young Children: When Loyalty Trumps Other Moral Concerns. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 250–250. 21 indexed citations
6.
Misch, Antonia, et al.. (2018). Temporal dynamics of partisan identity fusion and prosociality during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Self and Identity. 17(5). 531–548. 21 indexed citations
7.
Yang, Fan, et al.. (2018). In Defense of the Commons: Young Children Negatively Evaluate and Sanction Free Riders. Psychological Science. 29(10). 1598–1611. 31 indexed citations
8.
Misch, Antonia, Harriet Over, & Malinda Carpenter. (2015). I won’t tell: Young children show loyalty to their group by keeping group secrets. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 142. 96–106. 53 indexed citations
9.
Misch, Antonia, Harriet Over, & Malinda Carpenter. (2014). Stick with your group: Young children’s attitudes about group loyalty. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 126. 19–36. 41 indexed citations
10.
Herrmann, Esther, Antonia Misch, María Victoria Hernández‐Lloreda, & Michael Tomasello. (2014). Uniquely human self‐control begins at school age. Developmental Science. 18(6). 979–993. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026