Eugene R. Delay

1.3k total citations
58 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Eugene R. Delay is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Eugene R. Delay has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Sensory Systems, 28 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 24 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Eugene R. Delay's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (34 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (28 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (22 papers). Eugene R. Delay is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (34 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (28 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (22 papers). Eugene R. Delay collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Eugene R. Delay's co-authors include Rona J. Delay, Nabanita Mukherjee, Robert F. Margolskee, Shreoshi Pal Choudhuri, Benjamin K. Eschle, James M. Walker, M.Clara Sañudo-Peña, Walter Isaac, Kang Tsou and Stefan Gutknecht and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Eugene R. Delay

55 papers receiving 989 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eugene R. Delay United States 19 576 553 354 210 177 58 1.0k
Nao Horio Japan 15 607 1.1× 637 1.2× 289 0.8× 237 1.1× 41 0.2× 18 960
Robert F. Lundy United States 18 384 0.7× 492 0.9× 140 0.4× 217 1.0× 82 0.5× 37 900
Daniel A. Deems United States 16 1.0k 1.8× 717 1.3× 440 1.2× 346 1.6× 249 1.4× 24 1.7k
Noritaka Sako Japan 19 463 0.8× 663 1.2× 188 0.5× 435 2.1× 244 1.4× 34 1.2k
Hideki Kashiwadani Japan 13 561 1.0× 226 0.4× 171 0.5× 429 2.0× 203 1.1× 24 822
Nixon M. Abraham India 9 756 1.3× 279 0.5× 269 0.8× 619 2.9× 185 1.0× 20 1.2k
Masahiro Imaizumi Japan 13 296 0.5× 261 0.5× 86 0.2× 122 0.6× 61 0.3× 25 725
Andrew H. Moberly United States 14 420 0.7× 269 0.5× 178 0.5× 357 1.7× 209 1.2× 22 804
Anthony L Jinks Australia 15 563 1.0× 450 0.8× 372 1.1× 226 1.1× 121 0.7× 28 945
Isabel Úbeda‐Bañón Spain 23 688 1.2× 461 0.8× 222 0.6× 499 2.4× 171 1.0× 54 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene R. Delay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene R. Delay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene R. Delay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene R. Delay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene R. Delay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene R. Delay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene R. Delay. The network helps show where Eugene R. Delay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene R. Delay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene R. Delay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene R. Delay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene R. Delay. Eugene R. Delay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (2019). Cyclophosphamide and the taste system: Effects of dose fractionation and amifostine on taste cell renewal. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0214890–e0214890. 16 indexed citations
2.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (2018). Dried bonito dashi: Contributions of mineral salts and organic acids to the taste of dashi. Physiology & Behavior. 199. 127–136. 9 indexed citations
3.
Eschle, Benjamin K., et al.. (2017). Comparison of the Tastes of L-Alanine and Monosodium Glutamate in C57BL/6J Wild Type and T1r3 Knockout Mice. Chemical Senses. 42(7). 563–573. 7 indexed citations
4.
Mukherjee, Nabanita, Shreoshi Pal Choudhuri, Rona J. Delay, & Eugene R. Delay. (2017). Cellular mechanisms of cyclophosphamide-induced taste loss in mice. PLoS ONE. 12(9). e0185473–e0185473. 27 indexed citations
5.
Choudhuri, Shreoshi Pal, Rona J. Delay, & Eugene R. Delay. (2015). Metabotropic glutamate receptors are involved in the detection of IMP and l-amino acids by mouse taste sensory cells. Neuroscience. 316. 94–108. 27 indexed citations
6.
Delay, Eugene R. & Takashi Kondoh. (2015). Dried Bonito Dashi: Taste Qualities Evaluated Using Conditioned Taste Aversion Methods in Wild-Type and T1R1 Knockout Mice. Chemical Senses. 40(2). 125–140. 14 indexed citations
7.
Choudhuri, Shreoshi Pal, Rona J. Delay, & Eugene R. Delay. (2015). L-Amino Acids Elicit Diverse Response Patterns in Taste Sensory Cells: A Role for Multiple Receptors. PLoS ONE. 10(6). e0130088–e0130088. 31 indexed citations
8.
Mukherjee, Nabanita, Brittany L. Carroll, Jeffrey L. Spees, & Eugene R. Delay. (2013). Pre-Treatment with Amifostine Protects against Cyclophosphamide-Induced Disruption of Taste in Mice. PLoS ONE. 8(4). e61607–e61607. 32 indexed citations
9.
Eschle, Benjamin K., et al.. (2009). Double P2X2/P2X3 Purinergic Receptor Knockout Mice Do Not Taste NaCl or the Artificial Sweetener SC45647. Chemical Senses. 34(9). 789–797. 42 indexed citations
10.
Eschle, Benjamin K., et al.. (2008). Behavioral comparison of sucrose and l-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (l-AP4) tastes in rats: Does l-AP4 have a sweet taste?. Neuroscience. 155(2). 522–529. 3 indexed citations
11.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (2006). Sucrose and Monosodium Glutamate Taste Thresholds and Discrimination Ability of T1R3 Knockout Mice. Chemical Senses. 31(4). 351–357. 97 indexed citations
12.
Ruiz, Christian, et al.. (2006). Detection of NaCl and KCl in TRPV1 Knockout Mice. Chemical Senses. 31(9). 813–820. 64 indexed citations
13.
Delay, Eugene R.. (2004). Glutamate Taste: Discrimination between the Tastes of Glutamate Agonists and Monosodium Glutamate in Rats. Chemical Senses. 29(4). 291–299. 24 indexed citations
14.
Delay, Eugene R.. (2001). Cross-modal transfer effects on visual discrimination depends on lesion location in the rat visual system. Physiology & Behavior. 73(4). 609–620. 2 indexed citations
15.
Delay, Eugene R.. (2000). Taste Preference Synergy Between Glutamate Receptor Agonists and Inosine Monophosphate in Rats. Chemical Senses. 25(5). 507–515. 37 indexed citations
16.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (1996). Comparison of compound and cross-modal training on postoperative visual relearning of visual decorticate rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 79(1-2). 137–143. 5 indexed citations
17.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (1994). Crossmodal training reduces behavioral deficits in rats after either auditory or visual cortex lesions. Physiology & Behavior. 55(2). 293–300. 10 indexed citations
18.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (1994). Sucrose threshold variation during the menstrual cycle. Physiology & Behavior. 56(2). 237–239. 53 indexed citations
19.
Delay, Eugene R., et al.. (1988). Age changes in electrophysiological measures of the superior colliculus and occipital cortex. Physiology & Behavior. 42(2). 163–166. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026