Annika Steiber

1.1k citations
29 papers · 609 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Annika Steiber

27 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Annika Steiber
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 254
  • Business and International Management 59
  • Strategy and Management 349
  • Management Information Systems 96
  • Accounting 81
Replace Sverker Alänge with:
Sverker Alänge Sweden
Fábio Lotti Oliva Brazil
Nicola Del Sarto Italy
Jason Li‐Ying Denmark
María José Oltra Mestre Spain
Marc Sosna Spain
Virginia Simón-Moya Spain
Cong Cheng China
Elena Pellizzoni Italy
S.C.J.J. Kortmann Netherlands
Annika Steiber relative to Sverker Alänge Sweden Sverker Alänge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sverker Alänge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annika Steiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annika Steiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annika Steiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annika Steiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annika Steiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annika Steiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annika Steiber. The network helps show where Annika Steiber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Annika Steiber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annika Steiber Line = papers co-authored together Annika Steiber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202082
2 201377
3 202167
4 202048
5 202339
6 202133
7 201228
8 202028
9 200926
10 201521
11 201818
12 201517
13 201117
14 201317
15 201411
16 201411
17 201510
18 202010
19 202010
20 20219

About Annika Steiber

Annika Steiber is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Accounting, having authored 29 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (21 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (11 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (5 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (3 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (3 papers) and Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (254 citations), Business and International Management (59 citations), Strategy and Management (349 citations), Management Information Systems (96 citations) and Accounting (81 citations). Annika Steiber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Sverker Alänge, Vincenzo Corvello, Swapan Ghosh, Saverino Verteramo, Alberto Michele Felicetti and Nicole Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Innovation Management, Business Horizons, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence and International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact