Annelies Verdoolaege
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Law top 2%
- History top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Mark ShawLyn S. GraybillDeborah PoselGraeme SimpsonCharles Villa‐VicencioErik DoxtaderKoen StroekenNico Van de Weghe
- Topics
- South African History and Culture (11 papers)Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (6 papers)Legal Issues in South Africa (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Annelies Verdoolaege
22 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 223
- Political Science and International Relations 70
- Law 60
- History 55
- Gender Studies 34
Countries citing papers authored by Annelies Verdoolaege
This map shows the geographic impact of Annelies Verdoolaege's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelies Verdoolaege with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelies Verdoolaege more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annelies Verdoolaege
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelies Verdoolaege. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelies Verdoolaege. The network helps show where Annelies Verdoolaege may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelies Verdoolaege
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelies Verdoolaege. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelies Verdoolaege based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelies Verdoolaege. Annelies Verdoolaege is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | Grammatica van het Afrikaans | 1 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | Review of "Commissioning the Past. Understanding South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, by Deborah Posel & Graeme Simpson (eds.), and "Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Miracle or Model?", by Lyn S. Graybill | 1 |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 79 |
About Annelies Verdoolaege
Annelies Verdoolaege is a scholar working on History, Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (11 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (6 papers) and Legal Issues in South Africa (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (60 citations), History (55 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (223 citations). Annelies Verdoolaege has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Shaw, Lyn S. Graybill, Deborah Posel, Graeme Simpson, Charles Villa‐Vicencio, Erik Doxtader, Koen Stroeken, Nico Van de Weghe, Kristien Ooms and Femke De Backere. Their work appears in journals such as African Studies Review, The Journal of Modern African Studies and Discourse Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.